Loul Posted October 8, 2020 Report Share Posted October 8, 2020 I have a question regarding CDRL Numbering in Block 1. I have always seen numbering A001, A002, etc. Today in reviewing a solicitation there were CDRLs numbered with an "A", "B", and "C" as the starting alpha character. The number of the preceding CDRL was not A999, so i am wondering if the leading Alpha character has any special meaning or significance. Thank for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mansfield Posted October 8, 2020 Report Share Posted October 8, 2020 Yes, the leading alpha character identifies the exhibit. Exhibit A contains data items A001, A002, A003,... Exhibit B contains data items B001, B002, B003,... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseO Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 Hi, As it relates to this topic I am posting this question here. I am in the process of preparing for an acquisition purchase. I have previously supported PO implementation contracting activities (for years). However, this is the first time I have worked within the process that comes before award. Now, my issue at the moment is about selecting the appropriate CDRLs for the solicitation. I see that Don mentions "exhibits" ? What are exhibits? I nee to decide which CDRLs to request the vendor. Thanks in advance, Jose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mansfield Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 1 hour ago, JoseO said: I see that Don mentions "exhibits" ? What are exhibits? DFARS 204.7101: Quote “Exhibit” means a document, referred to in a contract, which is attached and establishes requirements for deliverables. The term shall not be used to refer to any other kind of attachment to a contract. The DD Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements List, is always an exhibit, rather than an attachment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseO Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 43 minutes ago, Don Mansfield said: DFARS 204.7101: Dan, Much appreciated for the response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mansfield Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 No problem, Juan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseO Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 1 minute ago, Don Mansfield said: No problem, Juan. It's Jose...but I laughed anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mansfield Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 Yes, and I'm Don.😀 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted March 26, 2021 Report Share Posted March 26, 2021 5 hours ago, Don Mansfield said: Yes, and I'm Don.😀 But maybe Don Juan? 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoseO Posted March 29, 2021 Report Share Posted March 29, 2021 On 3/26/2021 at 5:52 PM, C Culham said: But maybe Don Juan? 🤣 LOL!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts