Researching Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 If a contract contains FAR 52.232-16 and none of the conditions in paragraph ©, "Reduction or suspension" apply, can the CO reduce or suspend progress payments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
here_2_help Posted January 21, 2011 Report Share Posted January 21, 2011 If a contract contains FAR 52.232-16 and none of the conditions in paragraph ?, "Reduction or suspension" apply, can the CO reduce or suspend progress payments? I have two answers. 1. If none of the conditions apply, then what rationale would the CO use? 2. Under proposed (not final) DFARS rule-making, not only would the CO have the authority to suspend progress payments, the CO would be required to reduce progress payments if contractor business systems were found to have significant deficiences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vern Edwards Posted January 21, 2011 Report Share Posted January 21, 2011 If you haven't already done so, you should read FAR 32.503-6, Suspension or reduction of payments. Such an act is exceedingly serious and you should not do it unless you have valid and well-documented reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Researching Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 If you haven't already done so, you should read FAR 32.503-6, Suspension or reduction of payments. Such an act is exceedingly serious and you should not do it unless you have valid and well-documented reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Researching Posted January 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2011 If you haven't already done so, you should read FAR 32.503-6, Suspension or reduction of payments. Such an act is exceedingly serious and you should not do it unless you have valid and well-documented reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.gif)
Recommended Posts