jcjiii

If it is FFP, how does your CO know the sub overran his cost? And was your subcontract FFP also? or was this a hybrid contract with a cost line item. Was this the only area you were rated SAT? I understand everyone's points about SAT being good but in the world of competition and past performance trade offs many times SAT is a losing rating. SAT on this CPAR is probably easily explained to an evaluator since it should not have even been on the CPAR of an FFP but SAT in other situations could easily mean you lose even if you have low offer.

Was the mod which established the new completion date for the option also bilateral? What was the cause of the extension? Was it the differing site condition which you mention in post 5? A Government caused delay would not change the daily amount of LDs through it may be cause for the time extension. Is the Differing Site condition discussion only open for settling the cost or will there be another time extention when it is resolved? You might find these links useful: http://redbook.gao.gov/3/fl0013961.php http://www.gao.gov/assets/410/406969.pdf http://openjurist.org/341/f2d/998/southwest-engineering-company-v-united-states