formerfed Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 17 minutes ago, FAR-flung 1102 said: Stay tuned...there is an open DFARS Case 2019-D034 on the topic. Stay tuned? For how long? 😂 This was part of the 2017 NDAA from December 2016 I think. So 4.5 years later the DFARS council can’t incorporate something by now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamaal Valentine Posted May 15, 2021 Report Share Posted May 15, 2021 On 5/13/2021 at 4:23 PM, joel hoffman said: (2) through (5) are directly related to (1). I’m not saying that a typical service contract to inspect or repair an individual item couldn’t be a commercial service. Go back to what I originally said. What do you mean that (2) through (5) are directly related to (1)? The semicolon let’s us know they are related in thought, but independent. I’m not sure why you’re mentioning typical service contract to inspect or repair ... I never raised that and only was seeking to better understand something you stated: On 5/13/2021 at 8:00 AM, joel hoffman said: Jamaal, I think that you are reaching a bit. Generally speaking general and trade construction activities do not meet the FAR part 2 definition of “commercial item” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts