Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'task orders'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Instructions and Terms of Use
    • Terms Of Use
    • Before You Register, Before You Post, Instructions for Writing Your Question
  • Contracting Forum
    • What Happened?
    • Polls
    • For Beginners Only
    • About The Regulations
    • COVID-19 And Its Effect on Contracting
    • Contracting Workforce
    • The Good, The Bad, the Ugly
    • Recommended Reading
    • Contract Award Process
    • Contract Pricing Including CAS & Allowable Costs
    • Contract Administration
    • Schedules, GWACS, MACs, IDIQs
    • Subcontracts & Subcontract Management
    • Small Business, Socioeconomic Programs
    • Proposed Law & Regulations; Legal Decisions

Blogs

  • The Wifcon Blog
  • Don Mansfield's Blog
  • Government Contracts Blog
  • Government Contracts Insights
  • Emptor Cautus' Blog
  • SmallGovCon.com
  • The Contractor's Perspective
  • Government Contracts Legal Forum
  • NIH NITAAC Blog
  • NIH NITAAC Blog

Product Groups

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Rules & Tools
  • Legal Opinions
  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 3 results

  1. I would have posted this in The Good, The Bad, the Ugly, but I would love to get your thoughts. BLUF: 1. Is this a Commercial Items contract (or not)? 2. If it is a Commercial Items contract, how is the agency permitted to only award new task orders/task order mods unilaterally? Background 5-year single award IDIQ contract with multiple task orders/mods issued SOW Summary: i. commercial vehicle purchase services; ii. perform minor modifications to purchased vehicles to meet agency requirements; and iii. maintain the vehicles The IDIQ contract allows for CR, CPFF and FFP task orders and the government intends for the contract to be used for commercial and non-commercial purchases. There are no separate line items for commercial and noncommercial items with appropriate clauses designated for each line item The parent award does not contain 52.212-4. Instead, FAR 52.213-4 (Terms and Conditions - Simplified Acquisitions (Other than Commercial Items) is used. FPDS shows commercial products and services acquisition procedures were used for the parent award The parent contract contains no less than 15 references to the procurement of commercial items, including the following excerpt: “Commercial Items - In accordance with FAR 44.402, all commercial item purchases shall include the flow-down clauses listed in FAR 52.244-6, Subcontracts for Commercial Items, and Service Contract Labor Standards (SCLS). Supplies/services ordered by the agency are considered commercial items unless otherwise stated on the TO.” No task orders have indicated other than commercial items. FPDS shows commercial products and services acquisition procedures were also used for all task orders The agency will only award new task orders and task order mods unilaterally, citing authority under 52.243-1 Changes – Fixed Price. What am I missing here?
  2. There has been some back and forth in my office regarding whether clauses included in task orders have to be in the basic contract and I'm unable to find anything that specifically speaks to this, so I'm beginning to think I've been wrong in my assumptions all these years. I was taught many moons ago when I was learning contracting that in order for a clause to be inserted into a task order that it also had to be included in the basic contract and if it wasn't, that the basic contract needed to be amended before it could be included in a task order. Has anyone else "grown up" under this assumption and if so do you have a reference of where this is specified?
  3. Scenario: A Contractor is awarded an Indefinite Delivery Requirements Type Contract for services (various types of Instructors that will teach specific classes) whereby the contract is awarded subject to FAR 52.232-18- Availability of Funds, and the Government must issue task orders to actually order and fund the services. The contract includes CLINs for each Instructor, and vendors had to provide a fully burdened fixed hourly rate for each Instructor that would teach the classes. Question: Must the Contractor hire Instructors and submit the Instructors for Government required background checks before such time as the Government issues a task order and obtains funds? At the solicitation phase, vendors were not required to submit credentials of personnel, nor were vendors required to have any Instructors on staff. My concern is that the Government is requiring the Contractor to perform and to incur costs for a contract that is not funded, and when no orders have been issued. The Government says that furnishing personnel for the background checks is not really "performing" because the classes will not be taught, and is instead a condition of the contract. Even if furnishing personnel for the background checks is a condition of the contract, must a Contractor meet this condition when the contract is not funded, and is subject to FAR 52.232-18- Availability of Funds?
×
×
  • Create New...