2FARGone Posted January 30, 2024 Report Share Posted January 30, 2024 Hello, WIFCON Community! Do you all consider the following scenario an unauthorized commitment and, thus, requiring a ratification to authorize payment? *A not-to-exceed (NTE) $30,000 task order is in place for labor-hour services. * The COR authorizes the Contractor to work beyond the $30,000 in obligated funds, which the Contractor performs and invoices for payment. I believe the scenario represents the COR committing an unauthorized commitment and would require a ratification in accordance with the FAR 1.602-3 process. Even if there is language in the task order noting the Contractor performs at its own risk past the NTE amount, I believe the COR still committed an unauthorized commitment since he/she directed the Contractor to perform beyond obligated funding. Once the ratification is approved (assuming all the conditions in FAR 1.602-3 are met), the Contracting Officer can modify the contract to obligate additional funding. Does this sound right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerfed Posted January 30, 2024 Report Share Posted January 30, 2024 Yes, that’s an unauthorized commitment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted January 30, 2024 Report Share Posted January 30, 2024 1 hour ago, 2FARGone said: Does this sound right? 55 minutes ago, formerfed said: Yes, that’s an unauthorized commitment. Generally but an important fact is missing. What does the COR delegation letter say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2FARGone Posted January 30, 2024 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2024 @C Culham - in relevant part, the letter states "Please note that this appointment does not authorize the COR to... approve any actions that would result in additional charges to the agency" and outlines duties to include "regularly monitoring and tracking payments, ensuring that the total dollar value of all invoices does not exceed the total contract value..." This is standard COR letter language at the agency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerfed Posted January 30, 2024 Report Share Posted January 30, 2024 Yeah I would be surprised to see a COR appointment letter authorizing this type of action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted January 31, 2024 Report Share Posted January 31, 2024 3 hours ago, 2FARGone said: in relevant part Thank you for the response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2FARGone Posted January 31, 2024 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2024 @C Culham, @formerfed - thank you both for your insight/responses! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted January 31, 2024 Report Share Posted January 31, 2024 15 minutes ago, 2FARGone said: @C Culham, @formerfed - thank you both for your insight/responses! You are welcome. For a fun read do a search on this - 2023 Contract Attorneys Deskbook.pdf - then search the deskbook for "unauthorized commitment". Enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.