Jump to content

ULTIMA SERVS. CORP., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEP'T OF AGRIC., et al., Defendants.


Recommended Posts

ULTIMA SERVS. CORP., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEP'T OF AGRIC., et al., Defendants., 2:20-CV-00041-DCLC-CRW, July 19,2023.

Court's Conclusion:  

Quote

The Court DECLARES that Defendants' use of the rebuttable presumption violates Ultima's Fifth Amendment right to equal protection of the law

SBA Releases Interim Guidance to 8(a) Program Participants in Light of Ultima Servs. Corp. v. Dep’t of Ag. ruling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this instance Ultima apparently performed well and quickly hit contract ceilings.  Instead of working out something with Ultima, USDA tried unsuccessfully initially to award an 8(a) contract.  When that didn’t work, they tried a different SBA office with another company.  Probably a smarter course of action is modifying Ultima’s two contracts to increase the ceilings and keep the performance period unchanged.  That likely better suits the USDA program office customers as well.

Addressing this issue and obtaining a solid resolution will be challenging for SBA.  Unless the decision gets overturned in an appeal, SBA will face a huge increase and complexity with application workload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SBA suspended new 8(a) applications and is notifying existing 8(a) contractors that were previously accepted through the “rebuttable presumption” process they must submit narratives demonstrating socioeconomic disadvantage.  Isn’t that creating a new rule that is subject to the rule making process and public notification comment periods?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading the Federal Registers Guide, it seems like the revised application consideration process is a new rule to me.

From what I read from a few sources, SBA is urging 8(a) contracts previously approved through the “Rebuttal Presumption” to submit a narrative quickly.  The priority for SBA review is considering first those firms with new contracts pending.  Unless SBA has thought this out well and have definitive criteria to fairly and equitably evaluate the narratives, they are setting themselves up for criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On today's WIFCON front page, there is a link to CAAC Letter 2023-04 (CAAC Consultation to Issue a Class Deviation From the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Regarding the Small Business Administration (SBA) Memorandum, “Impact of Recent Court Decision (Ultima Servs. Corp. v. Dep’t of Ag. (E.D. Tenn.)) on the use of the 8(a) Program”).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...