Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'evaluations'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.

  • Search By Author

Content Type

Forums

  • Instructions, Terms of Use, Q&A, Commentary, Opinions & Debates
    • Terms Of Use
    • Before You Register, Before You Post, Instructions for Writing Your Question
    • Q&A
    • Commentary, Opinions & Debates
  • Contracting Forum
    • WIFCON PODCAST
    • What Happened?
    • Polls
    • For Beginners Only
    • About The Regulations
    • COVID-19 And Its Effect on Contracting
    • Contracting Workforce
    • The Good, The Bad, the Ugly
    • Recommended Reading
    • Contract Award Process
    • Contract Pricing Including CAS & Allowable Costs
    • Contract Administration
    • Schedules, GWACS, MACs, IDIQs
    • Subcontracts & Subcontract Management
    • Small Business, Socioeconomic Programs
    • Proposed Law & Regulations; Legal Decisions
  • Contest

Blogs

  • The Wifcon Blog
  • Don Mansfield's Blog
  • Emptor Cautus' Blog
  • SmallGovCon.com
  • NIH NITAAC Blog
  • The Contractor's Perspective
  • Government Contracts Legal Forum
  • Government Contracts Blog
  • Government Contracts Insights
  • NIH NITAAC Blog
  • High-Performance Track Systems | iAutomation

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Product Groups

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Rules & Tools
  • Legal Opinions
  • News

Find results in

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start

    End

Last Updated

  • Start

    End

Filter by number of...

Found 1 result

  1. Keith

    Past performance not evaluated

    Keith posted a post in a topic in Contract Award Process
    Can anyone think of a reason why past performance would not be considered in a contract award? I always thought that price and past performance was automatically always an evaluation factor and then you added whatever other factors might pertain to the solicitation. Today I saw a solicitation for a service by the Air Force in FBO where it plainly stated that past performance was not a factor and to make it clearer they used italics to state that it would not be evaluated and the only evaluation criteria would be price. What could the protest implications be? There are a number of cases where the government was protested for not adequately evaluating past performance but what if you totally ignore the factor?