Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Wifcon Forums and Blogs - 27 Years Online

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

I was looking at https://www.acquisitiongateway.gov/periodic-table/resources/4935?_a%5Eg_nid=12150 at the last attachment and saw this:

"Quote A provides the best value. Quote A provides greater technical merit than either Quote B or Quote C, and Quote B provides greater technical merit than Quote C."

What is the point of comparing Quote B to Quote C when Quote A is the awardee? Other than maybe to illustrate that Quote C is not an interested party because they are not next in line for award?

If you have 5 quotes, how do most COs do it? Do you do this:

Choice 1:

Quote A vs Quote B

Quote A vs Quote C

Quote A vs Quote D

Quote A vs Quote E

Or this:

Choice 2:

Quote A vs Quote B

Quote A vs Quote C

Quote A vs Quote D

Quote A vs Quote E

Quote B vs. Quote C

Quote C vs. Quote D

Quote D vs. Quote E

I do Choice 1, and this is for any FAR part, Choice 2 takes much longer.

6 hours ago, Sam101 said:

What is the point of comparing Quote B to Quote C when Quote A is the awardee? Other than maybe to illustrate that Quote C is not an interested party because they are not next in line for award?

I can't think of an obvious point.

  • Author
12 minutes ago, Don Mansfield said:

I can't think of an obvious point.

How would you usually do it?

6 hours ago, Sam101 said:

"Quote A provides greater technical merit than either Quote B or Quote C, and Quote B provides greater technical merit than Quote C."

What is the point of comparing Quote B to Quote C when Quote A is the awardee? Other than maybe to illustrate that Quote C is not an interested party because they are not next in line for award?

Given your scenario, it is not necessary to compare B to C, unless you're making multiple awards or the SSA is just curious. However, C might be next in line for award if its protest were that the agency had misevaluated A or that A was ineligible for award.

56 minutes ago, Sam101 said:

How would you usually do it?

If Quote A were a better value than B, C, D, and E, then I would stop there.

57 minutes ago, Sam101 said:

How would you usually do it?

The SSA compares A to B, A is best.

Compares A to C, A is best,

Compares A to D, A is best.

Compares A to E, A is best.

Stop.

Select A.

It doesn't matter whether B is better than C, etc. In decision theory terms, A dominates the others.

That assumes that all offerors were evaluated properly and that the comparisons were sound.

or

Comare A to B, A is best.

Compare A to C, C is best.

Compare C to B... et cetera.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.