January 30, 20242 yr comment_81125 Hello, WIFCON Community! Do you all consider the following scenario an unauthorized commitment and, thus, requiring a ratification to authorize payment? *A not-to-exceed (NTE) $30,000 task order is in place for labor-hour services. * The COR authorizes the Contractor to work beyond the $30,000 in obligated funds, which the Contractor performs and invoices for payment. I believe the scenario represents the COR committing an unauthorized commitment and would require a ratification in accordance with the FAR 1.602-3 process. Even if there is language in the task order noting the Contractor performs at its own risk past the NTE amount, I believe the COR still committed an unauthorized commitment since he/she directed the Contractor to perform beyond obligated funding. Once the ratification is approved (assuming all the conditions in FAR 1.602-3 are met), the Contracting Officer can modify the contract to obligate additional funding. Does this sound right? Report
January 30, 20242 yr comment_81130 1 hour ago, 2FARGone said: Does this sound right? 55 minutes ago, formerfed said: Yes, that’s an unauthorized commitment. Generally but an important fact is missing. What does the COR delegation letter say? Report
January 30, 20242 yr Author comment_81132 @C Culham - in relevant part, the letter states "Please note that this appointment does not authorize the COR to... approve any actions that would result in additional charges to the agency" and outlines duties to include "regularly monitoring and tracking payments, ensuring that the total dollar value of all invoices does not exceed the total contract value..." This is standard COR letter language at the agency. Report
January 30, 20242 yr comment_81133 Yeah I would be surprised to see a COR appointment letter authorizing this type of action. Report
January 31, 20242 yr comment_81134 3 hours ago, 2FARGone said: in relevant part Thank you for the response. Report
January 31, 20242 yr Author comment_81135 @C Culham, @formerfed - thank you both for your insight/responses! Report
January 31, 20242 yr comment_81136 15 minutes ago, 2FARGone said: @C Culham, @formerfed - thank you both for your insight/responses! You are welcome. For a fun read do a search on this - 2023 Contract Attorneys Deskbook.pdf - then search the deskbook for "unauthorized commitment". Enjoy. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.