https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2022cv0364-41-0 

Don, why do you find the decision notable? Is it because the CoFC found it had jurisdiction to hear the protest, or for another reason?

16 hours ago, here_2_help said:

Is it because the CoFC found it had jurisdiction to hear the protest?

Yes. 

I wonder now if GAO will use similar logic in considering OTA protests?

A law firm's take on the decision

23 hours ago, here_2_help said:

A law firm's take on the decision

The last part is a little too self-serving for the law firm though

Quote

Although the Court ultimately rejected Hydraulics’ protest on the merits, the Court’s willingness to exercise jurisdiction is a welcome development.  OTA protest jurisdiction still remains somewhat unsettled, but Hydraulics provides helpful guidance to protesters on the factors that may militate in favor of a challenge to an OTA award.