Wet behind the ears

Thanks to all for your comments, especialliy for pointing out that either evaluation approach is permissible. Just to close the loop, the decision was made (for me) to go with 2 sample task orders, the rationale being a more level playing field and a more streamlined evaluation process (2 sample vs. 10 real orders)

I’m writing an R&D solicitation for an indefinite delivery/requirements type contract. Award would be made to a single offeror and the “umbrella” contract would be a competitive follow-on to an existing award. The current contract includes 10 task orders that we would want to transition seamlessly into the new award. My question is (1) should the solicitation’s evaluation criteria include a rating strategy for these ongoing 10 task orders or (2) would it be better to include 1 or 2 sample task orders instead? Some in our organization feel the ongoing 10 task orders must be included in the evaluation criteria because there is a bona fide need to award them at the same time the new contract is awarded. Simply put, if we know we need them we must evaluate them. On the other hand, some feel that sample task orders provide a more level playing field for offerors by limiting the competitive advantage the incumbent would gain by already having performed the 10 task orders; the expectation is that the ongoing task orders would be negotiated with the sole successful offeror after a source selection decision is made but still prior to contract award thus assuring the seamless transition. Any comments are appreciated.