Jump to content

willow

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Thanks. In some cases the contract is awarded under FAR 36.6. Shouldn't the agency include all contract types in the Sol and not wait to identify them at contract award? There have been some instances where performance on a TO is mandatory when awarded a contract so requirements like cost share and cost no fee added after advetrising the sol as FFP may be problematic for a contractor.
  2. Frequently I am seeing contracts identified as hybrid that do not clearly identfy the specific types covered by the contract. For example, In B the contract is identifed as firm fixed price and cost plus award fee and all CLINS listed reflect FFP or CPAF. However in I. Notice of Hybrid Contract, you may find a statement that says "This is a hybrid contract. The contract types are FFP and Cost Plus Award Fee". Then under that you may see, "The applicable contract types are--- and then a list of every conceivable contract type under the sun.. For example, T&M, Cost Share, Cost Plus Fixed fee, Labor hour, FFP-L, CPIF. However, there are FAR clauses in the contract related FFP and CPAF but there ane no clauses or other language to support, for example T&M or cost share orders. So the question is, in the scenario above, what is the applicable contract type assuming the solicitation was advertised as a FFP/CPAF IDIQ task order type contract?
×
×
  • Create New...