Justin Intern

DA, you are correct, I did mean FAR 15.208 ((2). 1) Yes 2) Yes

Our agency has a similar situation to the Sea Box, Inc., B-291056, October 31, 2002 GAO Case. The only difference is that late proposal was in response to an AMENDMENT to the initial solicitation. - The KTR who submitted late in response to the AMENDMENT was on time with their proposal to the INITIAL solicitation. - The KTR submitted his proposal via e-mail on his end at 1:30PM; The government received it at 2:30PM (30 minutes past the RFP due date). - This late KTR is the apparent low by a significant amount. Does the GAO case apply in this case or is the KTR protected by FAR 15.208 (2)? Thanks.

I have a quick question along the same lines of this topic... Requirement: IDIQ Roofing with a capacity of $6M. Contract Vehicle: MAC. The IDIQ requirement will be awarded though a task order under a MAC on let's say T.O. 15 and the new roofing work will be ordered against task order 15 for the life of the contract (1 year). Situation: Task order 15 was solicited to 3 MAC contractors. Contractor C wins Task Order 15. Contractor C gets all of the roofing task orders for the term of the contract. FAR 16.505 (B )(1)(i) states the contracting officer MUST provide each awardee a fair opportunity to be considered FOR EACH ORDER exceeding $3,000 issued under the multiple delivery-order contracts or multiple task-order contracts, ... First off, I'm wondering why not just award as a single award IDIQ. Second is it okay to put a whole IDIQ contract under a single task order?