khm9p4 Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 Is the 52.217-9 clause covered by the Christian Doctrine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ji20874 Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 Do you have a contract with options, but no supporting clause? Do the conditions at FAR 17.208(g)(1) - (3) exist, and did those conditions exist at the time the contract was formed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vern Edwards Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 1 hour ago, khm9p4 said: Is the 52.217-9 clause covered by the Christian Doctrine? No, because 52.217-9 is not a mandatory clause. It is a clause to be used by choice; see FAR 17.208(g). There is no legal requirement that a contract include options. See also Life Machines Corp. v. U.S., 143 Fed. Cl. 267 (2019): Quote As stated by a judge of this court, under the Christian doctrine, “mandatory” “regulations are law, binding on the contract parties when otherwise applicable to the contract, and need not be physically incorporated into the contract.” Bay Cty., Fla. v. United States, 112 Fed.Cl. 195, 203 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), recons. denied, 2013 WL 5346523 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2013), aff'd, 796 F.3d 1369 (2015); see also Enron Fed. Sols., Inc. v. United States, 80 Fed.Cl. 382, 392 n.11 (2008) (stating that, under the Christian doctrine, “parties to a government contract are deemed to have agreed to contract terms required by law to be included in the contract” (citation omitted)); IBI Sec. Serv., Inc. v. United States, 19 Cl. Ct. 106, 109 (1989) (“The Christian doctrine is available only when relevant statutory or regulatory provisions are required to be included in an agency's contracts.” (citations omitted)), aff'd, 918 F.2d 188 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Application of the Christian doctrine does not depend on whether the omission of a mandatory contract clause was intentional or inadvertent. See Tolliver Grp., Inc. v. United States, 140 Fed.Cl. 520, 529 (2018) (“The [Christian] doctrine turns on whether the contract omits a mandatory clause, not on whether the omission was intentional or inadvertent.” (citing Bay Cty., Fla. v. United States, 112 Fed.Cl. at 202)); see also S.J. Amoroso Constr. Co. v. United States, 12 F.3d at 1075. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retreadfed Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 In addition to what Vern wrote concerning mandatory clauses, see https://www.asbca.mil/Decisions/2000/49827.pdf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts