Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

Recommended Posts

Part of a pitch I'm putting together for management.  Essentially, I am arguing that we need some technology solutions to simplify some work processes that are frequent, time-consuming, and 'brainless' (ie, can be straight-forwardly handed-off to software).  As an example of this type of process , I drilled down into exactly what should be done to correctly use the extremely common FAR Clause 52.212-5, within my department, HHS.  It appears to be worse than I thought when I started out.

HHS has three separate deviations for clause 52.212-5.  In addition,  the -5 clause refers to multiple clauses which themselves have different HHS deviations.  By my count, the 52.212-5 clause, in order to be compliant, has to refer to at least four different HHS deviations.  These deviations have mandatory language that cites clauses which are obsolete, or have been removed from the FAR.

My conjectures:

1) Not a single -5 clause in any HHS contract in existence is compliant, in that they correctly identify the (at least) four deviations, and have updated deviation language.

2) Very few people, possibly just me, are aware of this fact (if it is true).

3) Very few people who know or who learn this fact, possibly nobody (myself included), actually care enough to get it right. 

 

I am venting.  I have no questions.  I would like to be wrong though, so please let me know if I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...