Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, FAR-flung 1102 said:

Stay tuned...there is an open DFARS Case 2019-D034 on the topic.

Stay tuned?  For how long? 😂

This was part of the 2017 NDAA from December 2016 I think.  So 4.5 years later the DFARS council can’t incorporate something by now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/13/2021 at 4:23 PM, joel hoffman said:

(2) through (5) are directly related to (1). 

I’m not saying that a typical service contract to inspect or repair an individual item couldn’t be a commercial service. Go back to what I originally said.

What do you mean that (2) through (5) are directly related to (1)? The semicolon let’s us know they are related in thought, but independent.

I’m not sure why you’re mentioning typical service contract to inspect or repair ... I never raised that and only was seeking to better understand something you stated:

On 5/13/2021 at 8:00 AM, joel hoffman said:

Jamaal, I think that you are reaching a bit. Generally speaking general and trade construction activities do not meet the FAR part 2 definition of “commercial item”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...