Elaine Posted October 5, 2020 Report Share Posted October 5, 2020 Why would be the KO consider incorporating the clause at FAR 52.215-23 Alternate I, as opposed to the clause at FAR 52.215-23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Roberts Posted October 6, 2020 Report Share Posted October 6, 2020 Apparently the contractor has or will be disclosing that it will perform added value work added by mod 01. The contractor is asking the contracting officer determine that the contractor has demonstrated that its functions under mod 01 provide added value to the contracting effort and there are no excessive pass-through charges in connection with mod 01 work. It seems also possible the contractor disclosed added value work under the basic contract and is now asking for the same determination for that work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Roberts Posted October 6, 2020 Report Share Posted October 6, 2020 Under 5 hours ago, Elaine said: Why would be the KO consider incorporating the clause at FAR 52.215-23 Alternate I, as opposed to the clause at FAR 52.215-23. FAR 15.408(n)(2)(iii) requires-23 and ALT 1 under circumstances indicated above. If the contractor has not demonstrated these items, there does not seem to be a contracting officer requirement to consider incorporating ALT 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts