lotus Posted May 4, 2020 Report Share Posted May 4, 2020 What happens if .... A contract's period of performance is over, and Invoices are submitted and paid, and a de-obligation mod is put into place and release of claims signed reflecting numbers on the de-obligation mod, and then it is discovered that the de-obligation mod was too aggressive in that it de-obligated money already invoiced and paid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ji20874 Posted May 4, 2020 Report Share Posted May 4, 2020 do a correcting mod or rescind the de-obligation modification and issuing a superseding correct modification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retreadfed Posted May 4, 2020 Report Share Posted May 4, 2020 In addition to what ji said, do not ask the contractor to give the money back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted May 5, 2020 Report Share Posted May 5, 2020 Interesting situation in context of the "systems" now used. Having not used a "system" for quite a while and understanding that sometimes agency processes are demanded but I really wonder if a mod is required and instead just documenting the contract file and updating the "system" is an option. After all everything with the contractor has been accomplished you are just doing what you need to do to clean your own house. Said with the personal ideal that a SF-30 is intended as a communication tool with the contractor not a "systems" tool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts