C Culham Posted May 30, 2019 Report Share Posted May 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Retreadfed said: Because 52.219-28 is the FAR implementation of 13 CFR 121.404(g)... I would appreciate seeing the history of that supports that (g) is specifically addressed in the clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retreadfed Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 Carl, there is no history that states121.404(g) is being addressed in the clause. However, FAR 52.219-28 was published in the Federal Register on July 5, 2007. The notice states The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on an interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement the Small Business Administration's (SBA) final rule published on November 15, 2006 (71 FR 66434), entitled ``Small Business Size Regulations; Size for Purposes of Government-wide Acquisition Contracts, Multiple Award Schedule Contracts and Other Long-Term Contracts; 8(a) Business Development/Small Disadvantaged Business; Business Status Determinations.'' Later, it states This interim rule implements the SBA final rule published on November 15, 2006 (71 FR 66434), entitled ``Small Business Size Regulations; Size for Purposes of Government-wide Acquisition Contracts, Multiple Award Schedule Contracts and Other Long-Term Contracts; 8(a) Business Development/Small Disadvantaged Business; Business Status Determinations.'' The SBA rule mentioned is the recertification rules stated in (g). Thus, there is no doubt that 52.219-28 implements 13 CFR 121.404(g). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 @Retreadfed Yes I found the same Fed Reg and changed my Thursday response to reflect same. You will see that I advised in that post that I edited my response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retreadfed Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, C Culham said: You will see that I advised in that post that I edited my response I do not see that edit. Perhaps there was a technical glitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 On 5/30/2019 at 9:59 AM, C Culham said: After reconsideration I have edited this post. I may have implied Yes in my posts but agree it applies to all contracts and further agree 52.219-28 so states the same. @Retreadfed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retreadfed Posted June 3, 2019 Report Share Posted June 3, 2019 Thanks. I do not completely trust computers thanks to HAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts