Jump to content

Multi-year Contracting for non-severable service


Policy Wonk

Recommended Posts

Can a multi-year contract be entered into for a non-severable service?

We have research contracts that culminate in a report that run for 5 or more years? I know the FAR limits them to 5 years, but courts have blessed requirements beyond the 5 years. My concern lies in the definition of Multi-year contract in Part 17.1 "a contract for the purchase of supplies or services for more than 1, but not more than 5, program years."

Does this preclude a non-severable service that runs 5 years or is there somewhere for guidance that has been issued post FASA?

I'd appreciate any input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can a multi-year contract be entered into for a non-severable service?

We have research contracts that culminate in a report that run for 5 or more years? I know the FAR limits them to 5 years, but courts have blessed requirements beyond the 5 years. My concern lies in the definition of Multi-year contract in Part 17.1 "a contract for the purchase of supplies or services for more than 1, but not more than 5, program years."

Does this preclude a non-severable service that runs 5 years or is there somewhere for guidance that has been issued post FASA?

I'd appreciate any input.

If you truly have a non-severable requirement, then you don't really have 5 years worth of requirements, you just have one requirement. And it's a requirement of this year. I expect you actually need the work done now, but the nature of the work won't allow for it all to be accomplished in this year. I'm not sure the 5-year limitation you refer to applies to your situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Vern Edwards
Can a multi-year contract be entered into for a non-severable service

You can enter into a contract for non-severable services that begins in one year and ends in another.

We have research contracts that culminate in a report that run for 5 or more years[.] I know the FAR limits them to 5 years, but courts have blessed requirements beyond the 5 years.

You say that you know FAR limits "research contracts that culminate in a report" to five years. You do? Please state where that limit is in FAR. I know of no such limit on "research contracts that culminate in a report."

My concern lies in the definition of Multi-year contract in Part 17.1 "a contract for the purchase of supplies or services for more than 1, but not more than 5, program years."

You don't understand "multi-year contract" as that term is defined and used in FAR Subpart 17.1. In order to understand, you have to read the entire subpart, not just the definitions. As used in FAR Subpart 17.1, a "multi-year contract" is one that buys five separate years worth of annually-funded requirements even though funds are available only for the requirements of the first year. It obligates the government in advance of appropriations, with a provision for cancellation if Congress does not appropriate funds for the future years. A contract that buys the requirements of one year and stipulates delivery or completion five years later is not a "multi-year contract" as that term is used in FAR Subpart 17.1.

Does this preclude a non-severable service that runs 5 years or is there somewhere for guidance that has been issued post FASA? I'd appreciate any input.

By "this," I assume you mean FAR Subpart 17.1. The answer to your question is no: FAR Subpart 17.1 does not preclude a non-severable service contracts that runs to five years, meaning a contract that is awarded in one year and requires delivery of a report five years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Navy/Vern, thanks for the replies.

I attempted to set the scope of the question by leading with it. I did a poor job identifying my quandry.

I absolutely agree that a non-severable service contract, for instance a 10 year study that culminates in a report in the 15th year is not prohibited. But being nonseverable, it would require full funding in the year of the need. this is the issue that I have.

If the report is the bonafide need of the first year, does the incremental funding authorization of the multi-year contract allow future year appropriation to be used when I don't have the funds now to fully fund the the contract when I issue it.

I believe that I have a single years requirement, which I believe would not meet the definition of multi-year contract and would falls outside of 17.1 which allows the procurement of more than one years and not more than 5 years requirements.

My concern is that in several agencies, including my own, have used the Limitation of Funds clause to overcome short funding non-severable service contracts (both cost and fixed price). My agency has already moved away from that practice and began using 17.1 to incrementally fund our contracts rather than funding them at time of award.

The question I have is that since I do not have adequate funding to fully fund my research and report when the contract is issued, can I use 17.1 to incrementally fund it in order to get around the requirement to fully fund the need from the fiscal year current when the need arises? If not is there something else that would help get around it?

By the way, I concur with everything in your post, Vern. I believe that case law supports that there is no limit to total contract duration by giving deference to DOL's interpretation that each option is a new contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Navy/Vern, thanks for the replies.

I attempted to set the scope of the question by leading with it. I did a poor job identifying my quandry.

I absolutely agree that a non-severable service contract, for instance a 10 year study that culminates in a report in the 15th year is not prohibited. But being nonseverable, it would require full funding in the year of the need. this is the issue that I have.

If the report is the bonafide need of the first year, does the incremental funding authorization of the multi-year contract allow future year appropriation to be used when I don't have the funds now to fully fund the the contract when I issue it.

I believe that I have a single years requirement, which I believe would not meet the definition of multi-year contract and would falls outside of 17.1 which allows the procurement of more than one years and not more than 5 years requirements.

My concern is that in several agencies, including my own, have used the Limitation of Funds clause to overcome short funding non-severable service contracts (both cost and fixed price). My agency has already moved away from that practice and began using 17.1 to incrementally fund our contracts rather than funding them at time of award.

The question I have is that since I do not have adequate funding to fully fund my research and report when the contract is issued, can I use 17.1 to incrementally fund it in order to get around the requirement to fully fund the need from the fiscal year current when the need arises? If not is there something else that would help get around it?

By the way, I concur with everything in your post, Vern. I believe that case law supports that there is no limit to total contract duration by giving deference to DOL's interpretation that each option is a new contract.

I can't speak to policy at other agencies, but incremental funding of RDT&E is fundamental DoD fiscal policy.

Your situation doesn't fit the bill for a multi-year contract. You can't describe next year's (or the third year's, etc) "requirement" separately from this year's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...