pricelesspearl Posted August 19, 2016 Report Share Posted August 19, 2016 Is anyone aware of any limits placed on how much work an affiliate can perform on a contract when the parent company is the actual contract holder? I do not believe the Excessive Pass Through clause would apply since it is an IOT and not a subcontract. Let me know if you need more detail. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted August 22, 2016 Report Share Posted August 22, 2016 SB set aside? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pricelesspearl Posted August 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2016 No, it is not a SB set aside. It is an IDIQ. Both entities are foreign owned. The contract holder was set up with a security agreement so that it could perform classified work. In the IDIQ proposal, the intent to have the affiliate perform any non-classified work was made clear, and the same for any Task Order proposals. We have been very upfront on the issue. Initially, we got some push back on charging G&A for both entities, but won that argument. Now they are complaining about how much work the affiliate is doing, but haven't offered any legal support (yet) for not allowing it. I am just trying to get in front of any argument they may make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts