Don Mansfield Posted June 25, 2015 Report Share Posted June 25, 2015 A very rare occurrence: http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/14-00916qp.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted June 25, 2015 Report Share Posted June 25, 2015 This came from the GAO/COFC controversy, if I remember correctly. This will be the first SCOTUS "protest" ruling on the site, if I remember correctly, but I believe it will be in the next term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted June 26, 2015 Report Share Posted June 26, 2015 This is the listing containing the Kingdomware protests. The last one is the one now before the Supreme Court. FAR 19.1405: Service-disabled veteran-owned small business set-aside procedures . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vern Edwards Posted June 26, 2015 Report Share Posted June 26, 2015 Bob: I have sent you an email containing Kingdomware's petition to the Supreme Court and the Government's opposing brief, so you can post them for those who might be interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted June 27, 2015 Report Share Posted June 27, 2015 Thank you Vern. I think the SCOTUS Blog has that information on its servers. Here is the docket with documents from SCOTUS Blog: Kingdomware Technologies, Inc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted September 1, 2015 Report Share Posted September 1, 2015 Several Briefs have been filed during August 2015 and they are available at the link I provided above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whynot Posted October 6, 2015 Report Share Posted October 6, 2015 The recent brief filed by the VA attempts to make a point that orders under the FSS or other MAS contracts are not contracts for the application of various statutes and regulations. Although this is not the main thrust of the case, it would be nice if we could get the Supreme Court to opine on this topic - of which we have had much fun here at wifcon. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/14-916bsunitedstates.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted November 8, 2015 Report Share Posted November 8, 2015 It appears that the Court may avoid a decision by declaring the case moot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whynot Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 Not moot - game on. Dec 23 2015 SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, February 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 The arguments are taped but they usually aren't very interesting. I'm very surprised they didn't back away--yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted February 21, 2016 Report Share Posted February 21, 2016 Argument is scheduled for this Monday, February 22, 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cds Posted February 22, 2016 Report Share Posted February 22, 2016 I just left the Supreme Court, fascinating to hear the Chief Justice's discuss the meaning of "shall" and questioning why agencies don't use more of the Federal Supply Schedules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whynot Posted February 22, 2016 Report Share Posted February 22, 2016 Here is the transcript. http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/14-916_c18e.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I had to smile. I was waiting for the SCOTUS release of new opinions in anticipation of a Kingdomware opinion. On the site I was watching, there was a VA Procurement Analyst watching. That person may be here too. Anyway, no Kingdomware today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retreadfed Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 The SC issued its decision today reversing the Federal Circuit. The Court ruled that the VA set aside procedures are mandatory and that FSS orders are contracts. Therefore, the rule of two applies to such orders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob7947 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 Kingdomware was decided in favor of Kingdomware. See SmallGovCon blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts