still learning Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 A few years ago, an official (Army? Corps of Engineers?) issued what I think was a policy letter explaining why construction is not a commercial item/service. Has that letter (that I can't find now) been superseded or rescinded by another letter or DFAR/FAR regulation? After many internet, DFAR, & FAR searches, I turn to you for help! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vern Edwards Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 I don't know about the Corps of Engineers, but the Office of Federal Procurement Policy issued the following letter in 2003: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/far/far_part12.pdf Note that it does not say that construction is not a commercial item. It says that commercial item terms and conditions are not suitable for construction. FAR Part 12 lacks clauses for handling critical circumstances common to construction efforts, especially those involving new construction or non-routine alteration and repair services.Clauses that would typically be expected in theseefforts include those addressing differing site conditions, change orders, and suspensionof work. The gap in coverage reflects the fact that construction contracting was not generally contemplated when Part 12 was promulgated. New construction projects and complex alteration and repair, in particular, involve a high degree of variability, including innumerable combinations of site requirements, weather and physical conditions, labor availability, and schedules. The current coverage in Part 12 fails to allocate risk in a manner that takes into account the nature of these activities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
still learning Posted June 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 That's it, Vern! Thanks for the letter & the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts