DMB044 Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 My Gov't agency wants the contractor to send out RFPs for goods/services to be purchased under the stimulas package. However, the agency wants the RFPs to go out before the buys are funded. Funding will be provided later before the actual selection and placement of order. Is there something wrong with this picture other than the risk being assumed by the contractor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joel hoffman Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 ...Is there something wrong with this picture other than the risk being assumed by the contractor? If the contractor explains the funding situation in it's requests for proposals and states that it will not be liable for any costs incurred prior to a funded order, what is the risk being assumed by the contractor - its solicitation costs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMB044 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Having come from the Gov't side of the house, the idea of a Gov't CO/KO issuing a RFP without funding is a bit questionable. I really didn't know what to think from the contractor's side, except the risk that the funding might not come through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joel hoffman Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Yes, but please define the "risk" to the contractor under the above scenario? What is it at risk for? It would seem to me that a supplier or subcontractor could choose to participate or not under the conditions expressed in the contractor's RFP/RFQ, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMB044 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Let's just say hypothetically that the agency we're contracted with has entered into a number of constructive changes and because of poor fiscal planning and not obligating the funds upfront, the contractor has taken it in the shorts on a few occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joel hoffman Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Let's just say hypothetically that the agency we're contracted with has entered into a number of constructive changes and because of poor fiscal planning and not obligating the funds upfront, the contractor has taken it in the shorts on a few occasions. Okay - if this is a directed change to my contract to seek proposals for upcoming funding, I believe that I would demand that it be in writing and that the Government fund my overhead and admin expenses for seeking proposals prior to funding being in place, if that is applicable to your situation. That way, if they cancel the projects, you can likely be at least reimbursed your admin or B&P costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMB044 Posted April 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Yes, I think that is the correct way to proceed under the circumstances. Good advice, Joel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.gif)
Recommended Posts