JimV Posted May 3, 2022 Report Share Posted May 3, 2022 If the response time has past and the respondent replied on time but erred in the email address, AND it might be in the Government's best interest to review and evaluate the response, is it acceptable to include the the late response in the SSN results and the market research? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mansfield Posted May 3, 2022 Report Share Posted May 3, 2022 What do you mean "acceptable"? Are you asking if the FAR prohibits it? If so, the FAR does not prohibit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vern Edwards Posted May 3, 2022 Report Share Posted May 3, 2022 1 hour ago, JimV said: If the response time has past and the respondent replied on time but erred in the email address, AND it might be in the Government's best interest to review and evaluate the response, is it acceptable to include the the late response in the SSN results and the market research? A very poorly asked question. Try again. Response to what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REA'n Maker Posted May 4, 2022 Report Share Posted May 4, 2022 That's why I never use imperatives in a SSN - incorporating as few "shall" statements as possible and including a "request" to have SSN responses in by a certain time. Basic business judgement which disadvantages no one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Culham Posted May 4, 2022 Report Share Posted May 4, 2022 18 hours ago, JimV said: If the response time has past and the respondent replied on time but erred in the email address, AND it might be in the Government's best interest to review and evaluate the response, is it acceptable to include the the late response in the SSN results and the market research? New to WIFCON. Remember Forum has a search capability and many questions are - What comes around goes around! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.gif)
Recommended Posts