Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

Recommended Posts

I found a reference to FAR Case 2010-003 in the June 2010 issue of "The Nash & Cibinic Report." According to that article, the intent behind the case was to revise FAR Subpart 17.2 to address extensions of services contracts for bridging to avoid breaks in service. Unfortunately, I am unable to find any other reference to this FAR Case -- it does not seem to appear in the list of open or closed cases posted on the FAR Council's website. Can anyone shed light on what happened to this case? Was anything ever done on the subject of bridging by extending services contracts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FAR Case 2010-003 was closed without action when the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC) and the Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) Council could not reach agreement. Subsequently, the DAR Council decided to open a case of their own, but it, too, was closed without action, when the parties could not agree on a unified position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×