ERS Posted May 12, 2011 Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 Somewhere long ago I recall being informed that a Prime cannot require a Sub to indemnify the government. Does anyone out there know if this is true? If it is or isn't would you be willing to describe why or why not? Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Vern Edwards Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 I am not aware of any statute, regulation, or decision that prohibits a prime from requiring a sub to indemnify the government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts