Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Faca Assignment of claims act'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Instructions and Terms of Use
    • Terms Of Use
    • Before You Register, Before You Post, Instructions for Writing Your Question
  • Contracting Forum
    • What Happened?
    • Polls
    • For Beginners Only
    • About The Regulations
    • COVID-19 And Its Effect on Contracting
    • Contracting Workforce
    • Recommended Reading
    • Contract Award Process
    • Contract Pricing Including CAS & Allowable Costs
    • Contract Administration
    • Schedules, GWACS, MACs, IDIQs
    • Subcontracts & Subcontract Management
    • Small Business, Socioeconomic Programs
    • Proposed Law & Regulations; Legal Decisions

Blogs

  • The Wifcon Blog
  • Don Mansfield's Blog
  • Government Contracts Blog
  • Government Contracts Insights
  • Emptor Cautus' Blog
  • SmallGovCon.com
  • The Contractor's Perspective
  • Government Contracts Legal Forum
  • NIH NITAAC Blog
  • NIH NITAAC Blog

Product Groups

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Rules & Tools
  • Legal Opinions
  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. I work for a company that finances receivables and have been noticing a tremndous resistance from Contracting Officers when discussing the Assignment of Claims Act with them on behalf of my clients many have told me they will not accept an assignment of claims at all. Many of the clients involved are primarly 8A small businesses who specialise in government contracting and are in a situation where they are refraining from going after new business because of the cash crunch involved in ramping up on a new contract. My corporate council has gone over FACA and has researched it and wants to take a very aggrssive stance that I don't agree with because as a third party I don't want to jeapordize a potential clients relationship with their contracting officer. This leaves us in a catch 22 as the client needs the financing, and we want to do it yet without the assignment we are unable finance the receivable at all. Does anyone have any suggestions for a good way to work with this so everyone including the Contracting Officers needs are met ? Our problem is we need to secure our interest in the dbt and I am also looking at other ways to deal with this. I am thinking a joint venture or teaming agreement where our role is financing and receivable mangement might work if the government would award a contract to an entity set up that way.. I have seen a lot of great information on these forums and any and all input is greatly appreciated
×
×
  • Create New...