TylerACC

130K. Mission partner wants to them to issue credit invoice. Contractor doesn't agree. Just curious on opinions. Don's statement earlier is true. This situation is not unique. I was curious if anyone else has run into this situation.

So, the employee's home would be considered a contractor-provided platform?

Hello. I just inherited a contract from a colleague and have a question. Services contract (staff augmentation) was awarded in 2019 with a 5 year PoP. Contractor had onsite (Government facility) rates and off-site (Contractor facility) rates. Contractor began teleworking in 2020 and continues to telework routinely. We discovered that contractor has been billing telework hours to off-site facility (more expensive) rather than on-site rates. We are working with Legal and DCAA to determine allowability but currently no resolution. PWS states the following: "F.3.1 Onsite (Government Facility): The primary place of performance for this TO shall be at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. Some customer support functions will be performed at the Government customer sites around the National Capital Region as indicated in the PWS Attachment 0001 Level of Effort (LoE). F.3.2 Offsite (Contractor Facility): To allow the Contractor more flexibility, some work may be performed at the CONUS Contractor facility as indicated in the PWS Attachment 0001 (LoE). If the contractor chooses to perform work at a location other than the Government facility, the resulting travel to and from the Government’s facility would not be reimbursable as a direct charge under this contract. F.3.3 Work Locations: The LoE listed in Section J Attachment 0001 has locations listed for the places of performance, such as but not limited to: Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD work will be performed off site; Work performed in the National Capital Region are performed on site." Curious on your thoughts on allowability of contractor billing telework hours to Off-site rates?