Jump to content

NewToGovCon

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Company decided to bid the opportunity after the question were due.
  2. Hello- We are responding to a FFP RFP as the Prime to the Marine Corp and there is a Travel CLIN for both the base period and option period. In section L of the RFP is states “Travel is on a Cost Reimbursable CLIN; therefore, the government will provide the unburdened overall estimated cost to be used in all Offerors’ price proposals”. In the pricing deliverable the government provides dollar values for the Travel CLINs. My two questions are as follows: 1. We have multiple subcontractors that will require travel to support us. Should we, as the prime, request the subcontractor not include travel in their proposal back to us since a travel figure is already provided by the government to us? If travel should be included by subcontractor, I’m not entirely sure where to place the travel dollars in their proposal within ours. 2. Internally we are not bidding any travel, again since a dollar figure is already provided, but are requesting BOE providers to bid the labor associated with a travel events and time on location. Just want to make sure this is how we should be interpreting the government’s expectations based on the above. Q&A period has already passed and we are trying to determine the best path forward. More than happy to provide any additional data or information that I may have mistakenly omitted. Thank you in advance!
  3. Hello All, New to gov contracting and ran into an interesting topic. My firm is in the process of submitting T&M rates for a development effort we’re we are a sub to a prime with the DoD being the end user. With that being said, my firm’s value is going to be under 500k (no material being quoted) in our estimation based on the SOW. This is non competitive request.My questions are as follows: 1. Prime is requesting full rate build up, I don’t believe we have to offer this as it’s well below the TINA threshold. Can we request this be removed? 2. We have foreign workers (Canadians) who are going to do the bulk of the work. Obviously we don’t have rate build up I.e. dcaa/dcma approved indirect rates etc. Is it sufficient to use recent POs as justification and simply state that rate and state build up will not be provided. Thanks, Newtogovcon
×
×
  • Create New...