An aircraft/wing isn't even remotely considered incidental property. The examples of incidental in the FAR are to preclude the -1 clause use for small amounts of govt property (GP) where risk to assets do not need that much protection. Something you need to consider is how will our aircraft be protected while the contractor performs the repair? Is it minor repairs or major?
Something to think about:
- GFP definition includes: Government-furnished property includes, but is not limited to, spares and property furnished for repair, maintenance, overhaul, or modification.
- 245.107 Contract clauses.
(1)(i) In lieu of the prescription at FAR 45.107(d), use the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, in all purchase orders for repair, maintenance, overhaul, or modification of Government property regardless of the unit acquisition cost of the items to be repaired.
- DFARS 228.370 -
(b)(1) Use the clause at 252.228-7001, Ground and Flight Risk, in all solicitations and contracts for the acquisition, development, production, modification, maintenance, repair, flight, or overhaul of aircraft, except those solicitations and contracts–
(i) That are strictly for activities incidental to the normal operations of the aircraft (e.g., refueling operations, minor non-structural actions not requiring towing such as replacing aircraft tires due to wear and tear);
(ii) That are awarded under FAR Part 12 procedures and are for the acquisition, development, production, modification, maintenance, repair, flight, or overhaul of aircraft; or otherwise involving the furnishing of aircraft