Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

Corduroy Frog

Members
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Corduroy Frog

  • Rank
    New

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Middle TN

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Corduroy Frog

    Cost Allowability

    Joel, the captioned quote was from me. A more accurate statement might be: "Unallowable costs are not chargeable to either a G&A pool or an Overhead Pool." Regards, Corduroy Frog
  2. Corduroy Frog

    Business Development

    Vern, this is exactly what I'm going to do. This overblown bloviating of a discussion is exactly what I wanted to avoid when I preferred simple answers, and I was even criticized for that. Of course, almost nothing has a simple answer, but in the evaluation of options available to you at the time, you appreciate clarity - not a cesspool of uncertainty in which to wade around. You guys spend as much time feuding with yourselves as you do feuding with me. I'm surprised for accomplished experts that you have so much time on your hands. I would, however, extend appreciation for those posts that appeared to be a bona fide effort to help.
  3. Corduroy Frog

    Business Development

    Thanks for your post Joel. I mentioned examples of activities which all companies engage, and the general consensus is that all of these activities are not even allowable at all. Unallowable means neither G&A nor Overhead. I have not extended the FAR definition of "advertising and promotion" to include business development activities such as examining the FBO, schmoozing the customer, knocking on doors, consulting with existing contracting officers to acquire additional scope, etc. All companies do this kind of stuff. Am I to believe these kinds of activities are unallowable under the mindset of advertising and promotion?
  4. Corduroy Frog

    Business Development

    Vern, you did give me what I asked for. If I can get straight up answers I can put up with the acerbity. Thanks.
  5. Corduroy Frog

    Business Development

    Thanks to all who have responded. Vern Edwards, despite his legendary acerbity, really cut through all this with a single one-word answer. Activities include such things as daily filtering and examination of the FBO, knocking-on-doors with customers, consulting with contracting officers in an attempt to expand scope of work. Travel to customers, meals and meetings to schmooze relations with customers, meeting with team members, etc. Not nearly big enough for CAS to apply. Does NOT include site surveys after an RFP has been released, or any proposal costs.
  6. Corduroy Frog

    Business Development

    Is there no definitive answer to the above? "Here_2_help" has a great history of helping with questions, but this time can anyone derive an answer from the above? Maybe the problem is me, in assuming that there would be a widely-held view that prefers one over the other. I am currently involved in a feud between a party who believes this stuff should be G&A, and another who believes this should be Overhead. Maybe, as Here_2_help says, there is no conclusive answer.
  7. Corduroy Frog

    Business Development

    We're all familiar with this, although perhaps under different names. Most of us know advertising is unallowable, but the unallowable nature is sometimes attempted to apply to Marketing. There is Marketing Research, Market Development, Business Development, etc. that is completely allowable and expected. Membership in a local chamber of commerce is not unallowable. Printing of capabilities brochures is not unallowable. My question regards "Business Development" or whatever name you know. Expenditures for business development, including labor, travel, etc. is most commonly charged as: G&A Expense Overhead Expense This is a general question with general answers expected. Some large contractors may form elaborate service centers which encompass some or part of the above, but I'm hoping for general answers. The question, if not otherwise clearly stated, is "which pool are business development costs normally charged to - G&A or Overhead?" Thanks in advance...
  8. Corduroy Frog

    Bottoms-up pricing

    Thank you.
  9. Corduroy Frog

    Bottoms-up pricing

    I believe the proper way to price is to enter data at the lowest level of detail, and allow it to perculate up to a final bid price. Managers and owners often have a problem with this -- they seem to find a "top-down" approach preferable. They don't want to go to the trouble to provide low-level data, and are totally in love with the price they think will work. Often their instruction to underlings is to "find a way to make it work" when it is simple as their numbers just won't work - 2+2=5 syndrome. I have a customer who takes my pricing and waltzes off into a delusional sunset by "playing" with numbers, and I am about to quit since I have other work to keep me busy and don't really need the money. These fictional prices are accompanied with a narrative which says: "ABC follows a pricing model based on rates resulting from a submission of 5-year plan coupled with the effect of an award" DCAA would crucify their "top-down" practices if they ever checked in - but in recent years DCAA has just about quit fooling with smaller contractors. I don't know that I can forge a question from the above, but I would like to hear from some of you as to whether this is normal and what you do about it. Comments welcomed.
  10. Corduroy Frog

    Contractural Threshold

    Thanks to all. The last two posts have answered my questions and the foregoing conversations were helpful as well. Best regards, Corduroy Frog
  11. Corduroy Frog

    Contractural Threshold

    Sorry, Vern, I don't have it because right now we are being approached verbally. I think when the threshold statement becomes available, it will be extremely revelant, and may answer some of the questions. I'll quote it when I see it - or maybe it will be in the form of a FAR clause. Thanks, Corduroy Frog
  12. Corduroy Frog

    Contractural Threshold

    Of course not. I didn't regard the matter of spelling germane enough to the conversation to make a difference. So far, the forum is 0-2 in answering any questions. I thought this was the purpose of this site.
  13. Corduroy Frog

    Contractural Threshold

    You mention "simplified acquisition threshold." That might be what I'm asking about. I did read the FAR clause which assures that the contractor performance must exceed 50% if "above" the threshold. Also learned that I may have misspelled "contractual". Appreciate your response, but from where I am in my knowledge base, none of the three questions have been answered. The specific questions for conversations are: What is the current threshold? Does the threshold apply to a single year or the total contract value? If there is a FAR Clause which determines this? (So I can keep up with it if it changes) Can you help with any of these?
  14. Corduroy Frog

    Contractural Threshold

    Yes, contractural threshold - of which there are many. This specific threshold deals with a threshold whose excess will prevent a contractor from using primarily non-employees to deliver. Under the threshold, a contractor may use a subcontractor or consultant entirely instead of using their own employees. At one time I understood the threshold to be $150,000. The specific questions for conversations are: What is the current threshold? Does the threshold apply to a single year or the total contract value? If there is a FAR Clause which determines this? (So I can keep up with it if it changes) Most of you probably have easy answers to the above as applies in most cases. Not asking about remote circumstances which will scarcely be encountered by a small contractor. Thanks in advance, Corduroy Frog
  15. Corduroy Frog

    G&A not allowed on Travel

    Regardless of what contract type, a separate CLIN for travel can exist, and can be charged at the direction of the customer. And the CLIN will be cost-reimbursable. To my knowledge, these Travel CLINs have never allowed Fee to be applied, but conventionally, G&A could be applied to the reimbursable approved cost of travel. In recent years, certain DoD contracts are insisting that G&A can no longer be applied. This concept seems to be immensely popular and spreading like wildfire. Government is going after this idea like a pig after slop. Imagine - no delay in DCAA approval of incurred cost of G&A, not to mention the cost savings to begin with. They should be deliriously happy. I can understand if this is put into a contract, but the fact remains that administration of travel is arguably the most cumbersome and time-consuming things that a staff can do. For the government not to at least reimburse G&A is not fair. Is it common for contractors to compensate for this by adding about a 1/2 of one percent to the fee?
×