

govtacct02
Members-
Content Count
80 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout govtacct02
-
Rank
Member
- Birthday 03/06/1961
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
-
ICQ
0
Profile Information
-
Gender
Female
-
Location
Connecticut
-
Federal Acquisition Circular 2019-02
govtacct02 replied to bob7947's topic in Proposed Law & Regulations; Legal Decisions
I don't know what I would do without WIFCON, either! -
When a foreign concern (UK; has a QMAC) is filling out the CAS Notifications and Representations and is claiming a foreign concern exemption , what is the compliant way to answer the question regarding the filing a CAS Disclosure Statement? Should they answer the question with information about their QMAC submission or leave the question blank since they do not have a CAS Disclosure Statement? Thanks!
-
We would have no way to provide that information to you without evaluating your particular situation...you have to go out for quotes...have you done that?
-
Thank you Bob. I read both side by side and the difference in the final one dated Jun 7 is that on the second page, the last sentence in the paragraph that starts "Effective immediately..." is revised as follows: "Contracting Officers shall implement this policy for all future solicitations that require a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data [emphasis added] and, to the extent practicable, in currently open solicitations."
-
Does anyone know where I can view a full copy of the CAS Working Group Interim Guidance Papers ? I had a link to a copy via DAU that was posted on this site years ago, however, that copy was missing pages at the end of WG Paper 81-25...and there is no longer a (publicly available) link on the DAU site. Thank you.
-
Order of Precedence - Subcontract
govtacct02 posted a topic in Subcontracts & Subcontract Management
A CPFF subcontract (not construction) is being closed out (we are the sub) and we need to understand what the order of preference is : PO or subcontract document, with regard to period of performance. There is nothing in the subcontract to state order of precedence. The PO indicates the extended period of performance, and it added value to the subcontract. The subcontract was not modified when the PO was modified. Thanks. -
You might want to read the Sikorsky COFC case on CAS 418 - selection of an allocation base for material handling that involved government property ($0 value on the books) was part of the debate. No. 09-844 ¶¶ 45-50; Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 105 Fed. Cl. 657, 674 (2012) (“Sikorsky II”)
- 9 replies
-
- material handling rate
- cost recovery
- (and 2 more)