Working on a proposal for a "best value" contract. I've been told that the government can't score a bidder lower due to delivery costs, but I haven't been able to substantiate that. For example, for goods which need to be delivered by sea to the west coast, it seems west coast bidders would have lower prices (and therefore, an advantage) than gulf coast or east coast bidders due to geographic location. Does anybody have any insight into how the government takes this into account, if at all?
Thanks.