

IAMBATMAN
Members-
Content Count
11 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Breaking News
Everything posted by IAMBATMAN
-
Pre-Qualification For Design-Bid-Build
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Award Process
@joel hoffman the program office is accustomed to using pre-qualification with their A&E work, I just wanted to make sure that there wasn't a circumstance of using pre-qualifications for regular construction that I was unaware of. The project will move forward as a typical Part 15 procurement. Thanks for the input -
Pre-Qualification For Design-Bid-Build
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Award Process
@joel hoffman Basically they want to do a two phase selection procedure for design-Bid-build. Their rational is that the process would result in the best qualified contractors. It would be go/no factors. -
I work for a non DOD agency, I have a construction requirement ( to build a regular building) and my program office is asking to do Pre-Qualifications. I'v only done Pre-Qualifications for A&E contracts, so before I tell them no, I would like to know is anyone has references or input on the matter. Thanks.
-
Cumulative Modification Dollar amount
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Administration
Competition may be required for modifications of existing contracts if there is a cardinal change to the contract (such as an increase to the total estimated amount of the award, a change to the Statement of Work (SOW), or an extension of the period of performance). -
Cumulative Modification Dollar amount
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Administration
Yes I think there should, mods sometimes add up to be 5x the original amount of the inital contract. J&A as in Justification and Approvals I use it loosely to cover the authorities under Subpart 6.3, the J&A's were Justifications for Other Than Full and Open Competition. Is that what JOFO stand for? J&A's were under the SAT so posting was required, just a copy for the file. -
Hypothetical situation . Let's say you have a competitively awarded Multiple Award IDIQ contract for Security Services, you compete and award a Task Order (Base +4 Options) for $100k. Throughout the 5 year Period of performance 3 separate J&A's for ceiling increases of $75K were approved, these are in scope modifications and there is enough capacity on the IDIQ . So you have an Initial Task Order value of $100k and three modifications that have a value of $225K . I would like to know if there is guidance on a maximum cumulative modification dollar amount, for example, something saying " all modifications shall not exceed the total initial contract value by 75%".
-
FAR 52.237-3, Continuity of Services clause
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Administration
In 2016 -8 was used to extend option year 4 of the base IDIQ to January 2017. In January 2017 -8 was used on specific mission critical Task orders that ended in January 2017 to extend them to July 2017 - 8 for the base IDIQ expired in January, -8 for those extended task order will expire in July -
FAR 52.237-3, Continuity of Services clause
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Administration
@Vern Edwards Term? it was a base plus 4 options, the base 6 month extension via 52.217-8 expired in January FAR 52.216-22 paragraph (d) "180 days beyond the expiration date of the contract" -
FAR 52.237-3, Continuity of Services clause
IAMBATMAN replied to IAMBATMAN's topic in Contract Administration
I appreciate all of the input, I’m leaning toward using FAR 52.237-3, here’s the scenario: Base IDIQ expired January 2017 52.217-8 was used to extend Task orders to July 2017 52.237-3 will be used for phase in/out 52.217- 8 says “The option provision may be exercised more than once, but the total extension of performance hereunder shall not exceed 6 months.” Does the phase in/out up to 90 days conflict? -
Can FAR 52.237-3, Continuity of Services clause be utilized on an existing Task Order if the Base IDIQ is dead? The clause was in the Base not the Task Order.
-
Can anyone recommend one over the other? The pros, cons of both. I have a requirement for IT advisory services, which is available through both vehicles. I have experience with GSA not NITAAC. Thanks in advance.