Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

FAR-flung 1102

Members
  • Posts

    144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

3,182 profile views
  1. A few ideas. Read, think and think again. Seriously consider volunteering for the assignments that others don't want. Learn something (strike that, learn everything) well enough to share it with others. Look for opportunities to do so. You'll gain more than one skill if you do that right. Repeat often. Pick a special skill to focus on and do that better and more reliably than anyone else. For example, for a newcomer taking exceptional notes and minutes can come in handy. Agreeable to who is running a meeting with a contractor, be the note taker... Arrange to distribute a draft for correction and follow up with a final version. Pay careful attention to details like dates and actions for follow up from each party. Find out whom to in include in the Distri (contractor?). Record everything you learn now as a newbie so you can be a help to the next newcomer. Do your homework...before asking a question look for answers...you may find what you are looking for or it may help you ask a better question. See here:
  2. https://www.govexec.com/management/2022/06/white-house-just-pulled-its-nominee-fill-still-vacant-job-federal-procurement-chief/367921/
  3. I have a bone to pick for some of the sharp tools that might have been included, but instead are lacking in the typical assortment given to the Contracting Officer when they deal with nonconforming services. As I understand it, the 2-in-1 Invoice most often used in WAWF (Wide Area Workflow) for FFP Services, does not allow for partial acceptance (it's all or nothing) on invoiced quantities. And often the Unit of Issue modeled in a template or routinely used for the sake of convenience in a line item is "Month" instead of something that might allow for acceptance of lesser quantities such as "sq. feet" or "acres" to give just two examples. I've seen a procedure to make a Govt estimate ahead of time based on such useful measures, but still accompanied by a suggested CLIN structure that specified "month" as the unit of measure...go figure? Let's think it over. What kind of signal are we sending? What kind lessons might be learned by the contractor if the Contracting Officer does not have the readiest tools available to deal promptly and effectively with nonconforming services which fail inspection and for which reperformance is not possible?
  4. If Govt was of the opinion that discussions are most likely, but not most desirous, could the Govt truthfully include "the Govt intends to conduct discussions" in the solicitation?
  5. Thank you, Vern, the history prior to DCMA is almost all news to me. Knowing this backstory will help when I'm facing divergent views on a need for COR Appointment in DoD where particular facts about a requirement show it might be wise to appoint a COR, but is it's still not required by DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d)(v) (a) or (b), for example a supply contract without reimburseable line items.
  6. You did not state, but I will assume for a moment that you are with DoD and that this is a locally issued IDIQ contract. If so, then why not be satisfied with appointment of a COR at the contract level and not appoint a COR at the order level? See DoDI 5000.72 Section 3, specifically the pertinent parts of paragraph b and c. "3. POLICY. It is DoD policy that:... b. Contracting officers will designate a COR for all service contracts, including construction, unless the contracting officer retains and executes contract oversight responsibilities..." "c. A qualified COR is designated for all contracts or orders placed for DoD requirements, regardless of whether or not contract actions are executed by a DoD or non-DoD contracting officer"... Emphasis added.
  7. So, to make clear for folks who have not run across this before, the FAR Council is pointing not only to criteria for "small" as most folks might expect, but also to criteria for "business concern" or "concern" when deciding whether to set-aside a services acquisition outside the United States; the Contracting Officer would need to consider not only whether the entity is small, but also whether it satisfies one of the two criteria of a "business concern", at 13 CFR 121.105. A small business entity that is not located within the US may none the less meet the criteria of a business concern in that it "makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor."
  8. Personally, I'd use "an FFP", but did some market research anyway on Google Books to see what a search of edited texts had to show about this; I ended up a bit surprised at pretty strong showing for "a FFP". Caveat: The search results are a mixed bag and not just contracting related: "a FFP" showed up in 486 results and "an FFP" showed up in 537 results
  9. Thank you for providing that. Back when I worked utilities contracts at Ellsworth AFB I had a set ASPRs on my shelf because at least one of my contracts was created under them. I wish I'd looked it over the ASPR in my spare time then...if so, I'd have had at least a bit better ballast if not wind in my sails. Do you know how I can find the ASPR now? I did a cursory search and didn't find anything.
  10. Vern, thank you...I can now take away a sharper tool from this discussion. It's interesting how the ability to make such useful distinctions is (or should be) the acquisition professional's stock in trade. It might be the only thing that no one else is equipped to do.
  11. Vern, given DoD's wave of adjustments in the past 10 years or so in pursuit of audit readiness and what Dr. Carter called "CLIN Integrity", is this informational subclin format still available to DoD? DFARS 204.7104 seems to me to allow informational sublines as long as doing so has no effect upon delivery, performance or amounts that have contractual significance... DFARS 204.7104 quoted below (Sorry, I won't be able to highlight pertinent portions from my phone):; "Contract subline items. 204.7104-1 Criteria for establishing. Contract subline items provide flexibility to further identify elements within a contract line item for tracking performance or simplifying administration. There are only two kinds of subline items: those which are informational in nature and those which consist of more than one item that requires separate identification. (a) Informational subline items. (1) This type of subline item identifies information that relates directly to the contract line item and is an integral part of it (e.g., parts of an assembly or parts of a kit). These subline items shall not be scheduled separately for delivery, identified separately for shipment or performance, or priced separately for payment purposes. (2) The informational subline item may include quantities, prices, or amounts, if necessary to satisfy management requirements. However, these elements shall be included within the item description in the supplies/services column and enclosed in parentheses to prevent confusing them with quantities, prices, or amounts that have contractual significance. Do not enter these elements in the quantity and price columns. (3) Informational subline items shall be used to identify each accounting classification citation assigned to a single contract line item number when use of multiple citations is authorized (see 204.7103-1(a)(4)(ii))."
  12. DoD implemented Full Replacement Value coverage in 2007 and so DoD personnel who do have a paid personal property move are not in a similar situation. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2006/12/15/06-9729/mandatory-provision-of-full-replacement-value-coverage-by-department-of-defense-personal-property
  13. I'm confident Vern already knows this, but I thought I would mention for those looking on that the FAR at 1.107 also cites 41 USC 1304 on the subject of Certifications.
  14. If the unintended outcomes of Acquisition Reform and Organizational Change were likened to a Star Trek alien species, which would it be? The Borg Tribbles The Ferengi Why? The Borg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg?wprov=sfla1 Tribbles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribble?wprov=sfla1 The Ferengi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferengi?wprov=sfla1 Bonus: Ferengi Rules of Acquisition https:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_Acquisition?wprov=sfla1
×
×
  • Create New...