Jump to content

emkrebs

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. It is in fact CIO-SP3 (the on ramp coming up in a month or so). RFP from "last time" states that CTAs (where the past performance and quals of all teammates are used in the evaluation) are permitted if in accordance with FAR 9.601(1) but NOT if the team is constructed in accordance with FAR 9.601(2) (which is the traditional prime/sub teaming agreement). I candidly admit I do not have a lot of experience with CTAs other than the traditional prime/sub. Looking for insight on what teaming options are available under the "(1)" - joint venture (requires a new entity), but does partnership? From what I can find, it appears so, but very limited experience here. Comment?
  2. Jamal - thanks for the info. Let me add a few specifics....my company is a SDVOSB/Hubzone, and we are considering going after an on-ramp to a large contract vehicle. Draft solicitation states that team partners' past performance and quals will only be evaluated if the team is constituted as a FAR 9.601(1) CTA, and explicitly states that a team composed under 9.601(2) will not permit evaluation of the PP/quals of the teaming partners. I have been struggling to find any examples of CTAs/documents for a FAR 9/601(1) type arrangement that is NOT a JV or partnership (separate legal entity). Draft solicitation Q&A makes multiple mention of "CTA or JV" implying they are two different paths to bidding. Additionally, Hubzone JVs are governed by CFR 13 part 126.616, yet the draft indicates a JV may not need to have only Hubzone partners. We are essentially trying to avoid the JV route to ensure my team does not get into any issues with non-Hubzone members. Any guidance on where I might turn for example(s) of a 9.601(1) CTA that is not a JV (separate entity)?
  3. Does FAR 9.601(1) contractor teaming arrangement require the establishment of a separate legal entity? Are there any examples of this type of CTA (not the prime/sub as described ed 9.601(2)) that did not establish a separate legal entity that anyone could point me towards?
×
×
  • Create New...