Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

MV2009

Members
  • Content Count

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About MV2009

  • Rank
    New

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,423 profile views
  1. Formerfed, Thank you, no question that the requesting agency wasn’t involved with the pre-award portion but OMB memo does state there are two types of interagency acquisitions. This doesn’t fall within the direct acquisition definition either and don’t believe this situation was anticipated based on OMB memorandum. If doesn’t fit as assisted acquisition, what would you call it?
  2. Seeking clarification on assisted acquisitions. The servicing agency awarded a contract for itself. Prior to one of the option periods, a portion of the requirement was transferred to another agency, hereafter referred to as the requesting agency. The requesting agency intended to use servicing agency’s contract, where the servicing agency would be responsible for contact administration to include exercising the option period. Based on the definition in FAR Part 2, I would like confirmation that this would be considered an assisted acquisition, even though the requesting agency was not involved in the pre-award process as the servicing agency was responsible for that requirement at that time.
  3. While it is good idea to look for another office to work for, you really need to discuss it with the panel and/or your supervisor. There is probably some constructive feedback you need to hear and if doesn’t work out between you and your employer, at least you would gain perspective to avoid those pitfalls or be mindful of them with your new employee. I think FOIA wouldn’t get you much, you could go the EEO route if you feel it is necessary but I echo what the others have said. The true litmus may be interviewing somewhere else and seeing how your current employer speaks about you.
  4. Just curious Prospect, what were you looking for? Every job has some mundane or routine elements to it. Being able to apply critical thinking, appreciate the details, and making sound business decisions is critical for this job series. The answer to your questions is it depends as it is highly dependent on the office you work in.
  5. I worry about the long term health of this profession. There are bright spots but systems being slow, multiple checks in systems that should be automated or eliminated, and lack of connection with younger generations is concerning. DAU is not incentivized to fail students so the rigor is lacking to determine top contract professionals. I agree hands on learning is critical but fundamental changes need to occur if the goal is to have any contract professional be able to work at a top organization and yield the same result as those organizations.
  6. REA’n Maker would be news to me if they could file a claim on something they wrote and won. Contra proferentem should apply.
  7. https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/ You can scroll next to choose archived version to get the previous version you are looking for.
  8. Barring anymore information, your subcontract is written like an agreement as the prime has complete control of whether you get work or not as it will issue you orders when they need you. Review your contract to see if you had a minimum guarantee LOE order in the contract, follow Matthew's guidance and call your prime to see if they would give you some information. I would suspect they will say they havent received that type of work yet.
  9. Joel, Sorry for the delayed response and Bob, thanks for providing search result. The terms are not defined in the solicitation. I agree with Joel. There are some that believe there is a difference between target and desired and a weakness could be rendered for merely failing to meet a target. There are some that believe when target is used with minimums, it is defined differently. I fail to see the difference between desired and target and do not believe a target is a minimal. That being said a response made by an offeror in attempt to meet a target may result in a risk that could result in a weakness. Failing to meet a target should never be considered a weakness for merely failing to reach a target because that is something the Government would like to see. To me, target and desired provide a benefit beyond the minimum requirements because it is something you would like to see. Could have this posted in the beginners forum? Sure. I agree that defining the terms would resolve this easily.
  10. Before I post on this topic, is the search functionality not working for anyone else? When I try to search the forum, I’m getting the following error: “Not Found (404) The requested URL /discussion/%3E%3Cimg%20border= was not found on this server. www.wifcon.com” If someone is aware whether this topic has been previously discussed, please let me know and apologize for repeating the topic here. In terms of a evaluation, what is your position on how to evaluate target qualifications, desired qualifications, and do you consider there to be a difference when target qualifications are used inconjunction with minimum requirements?
  11. Agreed, bosses would rather keep doing what got them into the position than realize they must change their focus when they get a supervisory role. The current demographics in the profession are a big part of the reason for all the emails as well as leaders not communicating effectively. Many are afraid to make a decision or have a creative idea. It’s not easy and good leaders need to have the discipline to maintain its focus on leading their team.
  12. Communication is critically important to lead effectively. In today’s environment, many believe they should get an immediate response and provide little critical thinking prior to releasing their emails. Many managers feel like they need to respond to the constant number of emails they receive quickly because the workforce expects it. When I’m talking about ground rules, I mean leaders need to communicate clearly and be transparent. In doing so it will free up the time they need to think critically about how to lead the organization into the future vs responding to each email from it’s workforce. The latter is nearly impossible to do since each member of the team can send multiple emails expecting an immediate response vs searching for the answers themselves.
  13. While the author has valid points, I wonder if they could handle the position they desire in today’s environment. Looking at the 1102 profession today, there are generational differences, significant knowledge gaps in the workforce, and constant tinkering in the entire process. Leaders struggle today because of the lack of ground rules they set and as a result do not have time to think independently on the direction to which lead.
  14. Vern, let’s be clear I’m not asserting the second portion; that deception is necessary or essential in sole source negotiations nor am I saying that I support it. What I’m saying is it occurs and negotiators on both sides may do it. I was asked to provide an example, let’s start with one of the biggest problems - material pricing. If a seller gives the buyer a material price based on a quote knowing it may (in reality, will) buy in bulk or has the material on hand to perform the job and it will use that material via an internal transfer to do the job it’s deception. A historical example (now resolved) that does not meet the definition of deception in every instance is Performance-based payments. The clause was changed to account for the fact that sellers were achieving a significant amount in free cash flow because the costs incurred were significantly below the PBP schedule. Another that has been said several times already is failing to bring someone to the table that can negotiate any change in their position when a change is required. Whether you agree or disagree to which the frequency it occurs, it will continue to occur. Failing to acknowledge it may occur, not taking steps to arm yourself with the ability to ask the right questions, and spot it results in significant risk that you may not be getting a fair deal. So instead of focusing on the utopia state, let’s focus on reality and what to do to identify deception when it occurs.
  15. Whether it is fundamental or not, failing to acknowledge that deception routinely occurs in sole source negotiations would make me wonder about the individual’s ability to negotiate a good deal. Firms do it rountinely. Instead of wondering if it happens or not, let’s discuss how to ask the right questions that would mitigate any potential deception during negotiations or what you do to handle it during negotiations.
×
×
  • Create New...