Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs - 25 Years Online

brent

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by brent

  1. brent
    My position is that there is no good reason to disregard other proposed pricing in the MATOC pool, even if they all have not yet been determined technically acceptable. I believed the competitive pricing in my situation determined fair and reasonable. Someone disagreed. Food for thought: No, although it is preferred.
  2. brent
    First, let me say I believe that you award to the LPTA because you have competitive pricing, someone disagreed. Matthew, I would award to them if I can reasonably conclude that the offer was submitted with the expectation of competition.
  3. brent
    Awarding a competitive task order. RFP stated that TO would go to LPTA and that only the lowest priced offer would be evaluated for TA (continuing until there is a TA offer, then stop). Can the lowest price be considered fair and reasonable when you do not know if the other offers are technically acceptable?
  4. brent
    Thank you for the responses. I believe Don's response is the best guidance available. I have been able to work around the PD2 error I get when trying to apply contract level funding instead of CLIN level funding. The SPS/PD2 guide presented discusses AF policy. Does anyone know of an Army policy that restricts it?
  5. brent
    PD2 does not allow it, but I have not found any documentation that prohibits Contract Level Funding. Is there any guidance that discusses Contract Level Funding?
  6. brent
    Did you mean "See FAR 5.201( b )( 1 )( i )"?
×
×
  • Create New...