Hex44

Following previous discussion on subject, which was before FAR 13.5 test program became “permanent”. FAR 11.105(a)(2) seems to confirm there is a distinction between Part 6.302 and Part 13.501, and that when using Part 13 >SAT 6.302 doesn't apply; the subtle difference is that 11.05 is specific to items of one manufacturer; whereas how I read 13.501 I could be awarding sole source, but the reason could be it was unusual and compelling. i.e., unusual and compelling for simplified acquisitions >SAT would fall under the sole source authority of 13.501(a), same if public interest, or any of the exceptions in Part 6 (though -6 authority would be probably be 41 U.S.C. 1903). Question: If I am using Part 13 procedures over SAT and not competing to the maximum extent practicable, 1901 or 1903 as stated in 13.501(a)(1)(ii) would be the authority, regardless of the reason, Correct? Reference: U.S.C. Title 41 3305(d) & (e) takes me to 1901(e). This seems to be the authority… it further directs to 3304(e) but that is merely stating a justification needs to be accomplished, and the level of approval.

Wow. Maybe it was a good question after all. Thank you.

Why are FACs still 2005-XX I saw they were 1997- , then 2001- , and now 2005- What is the driver here? When will the year change again, and why? Sorry if this is stupid a stupid or ignorant question, I may have learned it at one time but have since forgotten and am now curious. Thx,

Curious.... how would 52.211-6 fit into this scenario, if it's commercial we don't have to follow it / include it ??