Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About creyes814

  • Rank
  • Birthday August 14

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    San Diego, California

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. @ji20874- Yes sir. I didn't think an analysis was required but I told the CS to document in her write-up. Thank you for responding.
  2. We issued an RFP under one of our Multiple Award Service Contracts which included an incorrect WD. An amendment was issued to include the correct WD to the KTRs. Revised proposals were received and both the contractors have increased their prices. I've never been in a situation where contractors came back with a changed their prices due to the WD. Do we need to do any type of analysis? Any info is appreciated.
  3. We are working on a new task order where the current option year of the basic contract will expire tomorrow. The contractor has agreed to honor their current option year price for the task order even though the new option year will reflect a slightly higher price. Would accepting the contractors current option year price be in violation of the contract terms and conditions?
  4. Isn't there a FAR clause or policy that says if there is an IDIQ contract vehicle that fits a particular NAICS code or type of work they have to use those services?
  5. Is a subcontracting plan still required for a large business if the contractor performs 100% of the work? Is a waiver required if not? I couldn't find the answer in the FAR 19.704. Thank you.
  6. Yes I am. You were a great mentor to me at SWRMC, and you still are. Good to hear from you.
  7. Thank you Don. It's not spelled out in our NAVFAC BMS, NFAS or the NMCARS. v/r, Christine Reyes
  8. Can the Source Selection Authority and Contracting Officer be the same?
  9. I didn't think it was acceptable to tell the contractor how many hours to propose.
  10. Hello, I am working on a proposed A&E task order under a stand alone contract. I received a new purchase request and in the Statement of A&E Services (scope of work) the Project Manager has listed the number of hours under each work element such as "Work Element 1 - Project Management (include up to 80 hours to provide support that includes all activities required to successfully execute this task order"...…. I don't believe this is acceptable? The COR under this contract agrees with me. We shouldn't tell the contractor how many hours to propose. Please advise.
  11. Yes, the underlying contract is a multiple award. Is there specific guidance/policy that says you can/can't add options to an existing task order? Thank you.
  • Create New...