Jump to content

fereirra

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fereirra

  1. Think about this: I presume that the labor CLIN has an estimated cost and fixed fee. In order to move the money you'll have to deobligate funds from the ODC CLIN and then obligate them on the labor CLIN. Right? Now, by definition, when you do that you'll be changing the rights and obligations of the parties under each CLIN. For example, in order to obligate the funds on the labor CLIN you'll have to increase the estimated cost. Right? What will your explanation be? Are you funding an overrun or adding work? It seems to me that it will have to be one or the other. What about the ODC CLIN? Are you deobligating funds because the contractor underran or because you are changing its obligations under that CLIN?

    Yes, I see where you're coming from. So is the short answer "no," because the increase in labor would be considered an increase in scope? The only justification I can come up with is projected ODC expense was not fully expended due to less travel needed. And "unforeseen" overtime requirements increased labor cost dramatically.

  2. Is there an exemption for posting a sole source RFP to the GPE? FAR 5.102 states that all solicitations that have been synopsized are to be posted to the GPE. Is a synopsis of proposed contract action to sole source under FAR 6.302-1 considered a solicitation that has been synopsized? In addition, FAR 15.203(e) allows for sending letter RFPs for sole sources are these suppose to be posted to the GPE? 5.201(e) is not very clear.

  3. Is DOD allowed to fund contractor training with appropirated funds as required by the contract for them to stay up to date with changes to commercial software used in the contract?

    I researched FAR Part 31, and both appendences for allowable costs, but I was not able to get a definite answer. The broad answer was if it's required by the contract we can fund the training.

×
×
  • Create New...