Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs

gfsullivan

Members
  • Content count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About gfsullivan

  • Rank
    Copper Member
  1. It is not under SAT but used SAP procedures for acquisition as commercial and under $7M value (base + options).
  2. No, neither notice nor exercise dates have passed and neither will for a long time.
  3. Thanks for the feedback.
  4. @Vern Edwards The services are severable but it's no year funding. We would be buying more support in the base period but not able to buy the same level of support in the option. Do you still think we would have to compete or justify as some source the increase in the base PoP?
  5. Question presented: Are there any legal or regulatory (FAR, GAO opinions, case law etc.) impediments to reducing the level of effort (LoE) of an unexercised option year (subject to 52.217-9) and increasing the LoE by the same price in the base period of performance (PoP) of the contract via bilateral modification and not treating it as a sole source action subject to FAR 6? Factual background: In this instance, there will be no increase in overall contract price (including options). There will also be no increase in the overall LoE (including options). All PoPs (base and options) will remain unchanged. The contract is FFP for 6 FTEs of contractor support in the base and option periods.
×