Jump to content

jeff4757

Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jeff4757

  1. Folks- thanks so much for your responses!! subcontract is FP and is for commercial items. We just want the clause that tells the sub what is allowable and not for travel costs. Thanks again!
  2. Thank you all for your feedback. So what is the appropriate flowdown clause to subcontractor which defines allowable travel costs? 31.205-46?
  3. Folks- Why is there no corresponding Solicitation Provision for FAR Part 31.-specifically travel costs? Any input appreciated! Thank you.
  4. I thought I saw somewhere where if the subcontract hits a certain dollar threshold, there are additional FAR flowdown clauses required. Am I correct in stating the FAR 52.244-6 for commercial items is the clause to follow? Thanks for any input!
  5. Folks- Can someone educate me on Flowdowns for commercial items. I understand FAR 52.244-6 outlines the clauses required. But It appears dollar thresholds exist which required additional clauses. Can you help as to where/what those thresholds are? Many thanks for any input.
  6. Folks- Can someone educate me re: mandatory flowdowns to subs for Commercial items? I realize FAR 52.244-6 lists required flowdowns. However, I understand dollar thresholds exist based on the subcontract value. Where can I find that list? Many thanks for your input!
  7. Thank you folks! As always good advice and direction from WIFCON!
  8. Folks- Our firm submitted a proposal on a FP basis which was later determined not to be able to meet schedule. When the scope and deliverables changed, it was then in fact doable. However, the Government contracts shop issued a contract for the initial scope-not the revised scope. The COR told our PM to "just sign the contract and we will push the mod thru. We cannot wait forever for contracts to issue the mod." Is there a FAR clause the can defend our firm from not signing this agreement? Any feedback appreciated. thank you!
  9. Folks- Any feedback on this is appreciated! Is our company inn violation of the Distribution Statement by sending the Technical proposal to our foreign parent? Even tho our foreign parent did get permission to download the spec and SOW from FedBizOps. Thanks again!
  10. Folks- a question regarding limitations to Distribution D Statement: The Government issued an RFP for an SOW that can only be performed by our parent foreign company (Norway) Our company is acting as PRIME for the effort and generated the proposal, referring to both the SOW and the Performance Spec in the proposal which contains Distribution D (DoD and U.S DoD contractors only.) The Government did give permission for our foreign company to download the SOW and Perf. Spec from FedBizOpps., However, the PM for the proposal effort forwarded the Technical proposal to our parent company representative to satisy a request from our parent company. Is our company now in violation of the Distribution Statement on the SOW and Performance spec? You feedback is greatly appreciated on this issue. Many thanks!
  11. Folks- DCMA rep has requested a review of a recently submitted Government proposal. He wishes to review a more detailed list of labor hours broken down by LC and a more clear basis of estimate. What is our company required to provide per the FAR/DFAR to DCMA? Any information is appreciated! Many thanks!
  12. Folks- Can anyone assist in identifying a good source that outlines processes and procedures for Contract Administration? Thank you!
  13. Folks- Are you aware of any clause in the FAR that waives specific markings (IUID tags) for any items under $5k?? Also, our firm has a number of large dollar FFP contracts (PO's) that are significantly late and well beyond the original delivery f/c in the PO. It being FFP, isn't all the risk with our firm and the longer it takes to deliver, the less margin we receive? The customer has a right to cancel but is there any "90-day grace period" that forces the customer not to terminate for default? I appreciate any feedback you can provide. Thank you!
  14. Thanks to all and I agree!! "Performance metrics" vs taking care of your internal and external customers!? Oh well! I due what I am told! Thanks again!
  15. Thank you so much! yes, CM NOT a Government employee. this is very helpful!
  16. Folks- I have been tasked in developing performance metrix to evaluate the performance of a Contracts Manager administering CPFF and FFP NAVY Prime contracts. Can anyone provide bullet points on areas that should be considered under an evaluation? Your feedback is appreciated. Thank you!
  17. Thanks to all for your input! Very Helpful!!!!
  18. Thank you Keith! I sent you a PM and apologize for the late response. I would welcome your slide presentation and sincerely appreciate the offer! Jeff
  19. Folks Does the FAR indicate that a contractor-at its own risk-EXCEED funding limits on a CPFF contract? Any feedback is appreciated! Thank you and Happy New Year!
  20. Thank you sir for this feedback! It is very helpful. We are trying to structure based on delivery performance. Thanks again.
×
×
  • Create New...