Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Desparado

  1. The same language exists in 52.217-8 and always causes issues as some feel that you have to wait "within" 30 days (or whatever number you put in the blank) to exercise that clause, and others feel that it has to be prior to that time frame. Legalese and English are not synonymous.
  2. Sadly, this is an actual situation. Multiple award IDIQ A&E services contracts.
  3. Lawyers appear to be on board with the "some" as well. Small agency, limited A&E experience.
  4. Everyone's assumptions above are accurate. It is a multiple award IDIQ contract for A&E services. We do a QBS competition where the most highly qualified firm is selected for task order award IAW 36.6, but as a task order also has some 16.505 applicability.. The "some" people in my organization feel that no contract, task order or anything can be awarded without being priced, period... I appreciate all your input. It has been informative.
  5. Don - I agree with you, but unfortunately that is the battle I am fighting (and losing). They won't allow unpriced anything.
  6. Sadly, it is not, but I appreciate the offer! I feel that if this were USACE, I wouldn't have this problem.
  7. That was one suggestion as well. But, like you, I find that clunky and unnecessary. Sadly, my lack of A&E knowledge puts me at a disadvantage in these discussions with the HQ peeps.
  8. They don't argue that there can be options... but insist they much be priced. They are really just going with the basic concept that any award has to have a negotiated cost/price (even if a ceiling) to be legal and binding.
  9. Agree on all points. They state we do not have the authority to issue a task order without pricing for all phases and options.
  10. Oh believe me, I have... They are sticking to the article in the original post that these equate to unpriced options and are therefore illegal. We are making selection based solely on technical, then reaching agreement on a fair and reasonable price for the first phase of work (there are several phases but the latter phases are undefinable at a level low enough to facilitate getting a cost proposal), but their contention is that we still have to get a full cost proposal for all phases upfront.
  11. Joel - 100% agree, but we have some in our agency that state that we still have to get a full cost proposal even though the nature of our A&E work contains several unknowns that make it impossible to price upfront.
  12. BTW - I have this in Contract Administration because I am discussing task orders on multiple award A&E contracts. The underlying contracts are silent on this issue.
  13. So if we do use options and the FAR does not apply, how does that affect the idea of unpriced options? Since cost is not a competitive factor in A&E selection, is the taboo on unpriced options applicable?
  14. So does that then mean that we cannot have ANY options in an A&E contract?? Seems pretty restrictive.
  15. Would it make a difference if it was A&E work where we award to the most highly qualified and cost is not part of the competition?
  16. I've utilized unpriced options in the past but recently a co-worker has raised that these were determined by GAO back in 1986 ( https://www.gao.gov/assets/150/144237.pdf ) to basically be sole-source contracts. Does anyone else use them? If so, what additional documentation do you include, if any?
  17. I was reading this below and a thought came to me. http://smallgovcon.com/gaobidprotests/price-reasonableness-vs-price-realism-the-gao-explains-the-difference/ I then did some cursory FAR research searching the term, "price realism" and found zero results. Plenty about "cost realism" but no mention of "price realism". Obviously it's a thing as you can see in the link as considered by GAO. I'm just curious if anyone knows where the term came up and if it is rooted in policy somewhere that I just can't find.
  18. Ashley - Like others here have said, it is extremely rare that a waiver would be granted. Many civilian agencies have different education requirements (some only require 24hrs of management/business courses through GS-12) so that may be of some help. Regarding pay, have you looked at your current pay and compared it to the GS pay scale where you live? If you are trying to come over at a lower GS level it will be much easier than if you are trying to come over as a GS-13 or something like that.
  19. In some agencies all 1102s are Contract Specialists that are warranted (aka, KOs) but a check-and-balance system exists in that their work is peer-reviewed prior to release and if the acquisition is high enough ($10M as an example) a "level above" review is required.
  20. You can set a higher standard for past performance than the simple responsibility standard. For example, for a particular acquisition, you can set that all Past Performance must be at a level higher than "Satisfactory" in order to be considered technically acceptable. The TA is whatever the government sets it to be. As long as offerors meet that standard (no matter by how much), price then becomes the only discriminating factor.
  21. I actually think the opposite. I think it is underused. There's no reason why past performance cannot be part of an LPTA competition. Part of the TA could be that the contractor must have acceptable past performance based on XX. It would be a pass/fail criteria as with the technical factors.
  22. I would think that you would have to specifically call out in the solicitation that in the case of a tie, technical superiority would reign... I would lean more to the idea of having exchanges with offerors. Odds are that they won't both lower the price to the exact same amount and at least one of them would lower it a tad, which is all that would be needed. I did have this happen to me once doing a GSA delivery order. We pulled a name out of a hat (documented, with witnesses).
  23. The GPC is primarily used for micro-purchases, although some agencies are using it as the payment method for larger purchase orders or contracts. This is an unusual method and it will be interesting to see how well it works down the road. Getting that large a sum of money to pitch something (or at least that's what it looks like) could be viewed as innovative, or wasteful... depending on the actual results
  24. I saw this article on WIFCON's front page and found it confusing. I am curious what others' thoughts are on it. Pay a company $158,000 on the day of award? For what? I thought services or supplies should only be paid when the government receives the service/supply? I must be missing something but I'm not sure what I overlooked. Thoughts? https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1779609/inaugural-air-force-pitch-day-new-contracts-new-partners/
  • Create New...