Jump to content
The Wifcon Forums and Blogs
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    252
  • comments
    4
  • views
    10,882

Entries in this blog

 

Quick Guide to the Bid Protest Process

If you’ve ever encountered the need to file a bid protest, you may remember feeling lost or overwhelmed the first time through the process. Maybe you were just confused and unsure of what would happen as you progressed from one step to the next. If you’re in the middle of a bid protest or foresee the need to enter into one in the future, the quick guide below walks you through a potential scenario of what can be expected. SITUATION Your company just received a non-award letter or have been exc

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

Protester Not Found to Be An Interested Party Where It Was The Awardee

Yes, you read the title correctly – a protester actually protested its own future award. In an interesting twist of fate, a company recently filed a pre-award bid protest only to find out that the agency had already evaluated the protester’s bid and intended to award the contract to the protester. Daekee Global Company, Ltd., a South Korean company, protested the terms of a solicitation issued by the Department of Navy for ship husbanding services arguing that the evaluation scheme failed to ev

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

Protest Denial Stresses Need of Detail in Proposal Methodologies

A single weak link in a contractor’s proposal resulted in its highly praised proposal losing to one with fewer evaluated strengths. Seeking mission support services in its work to counter improvised threats, such as IEDs and other homemade explosives, the Joint Improvised-Threat Defense Organization (JIDO) recently issued a task order for subject matter expertise. Its award drew a protest from Sev1Tech, Inc. challenging JIDO’s choice of Amyx, Inc. for the task order. When evaluating the contra
 

Protecting a Forgetful Government – “Christian Doctrine” Alive and Well!

By Hon. Jack Delman We have all learned, some of us in school and some of us in the school of “life experience” that parties to a contract are bound by its terms. Not always, if one of the contracting parties is the federal government. We should know that the sovereign reserves certain unique contract prerogatives. One such prerogative is the right to invoke provisions omitted from the contract but required by law. In G.L Christian & Associates v. United States, 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
 

Protecting a Forgetful Government – “Christian Doctrine” Alive and Well!

By Hon. Jack Delman We have all learned, some of us in school and some of us in the school of “life experience” that parties to a contract are bound by its terms. Not always, if one of the contracting parties is the federal government. We should know that the sovereign reserves certain unique contract prerogatives. One such prerogative is the right to invoke provisions omitted from the contract but required by law. In G.L Christian & Associates v. United States, 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
 

Proposed Rule VAAR

On May 17, 2017, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a proposed rule in the Federal Register to revise and streamline the VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR).  Public comments are invited and must be submitted no later than July 17, 2017, to be considered in formulating the Final Rule.  Codified acquisition regulations may only be amended and revised through formal rulemaking under the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act.  For ease of reference, information on how to submit comme
 

Proper Classification of Workers is Important for Compliance with FLSA and SCLS

By now you have probably heard that the Department of Labor’s regulations for the white-collar exemptions to overtime compensation were finalized and will be effective December 1, 2016. You are probably also aware that your company should be analyzing how its employees are classified to ensure it is prepared to comply with the regulations come December 1. What you may not have thought about is how your analysis (and any changes to employee exemption status) may impact your federal government con
 

President Trump Notwithstanding, Employment Law Compliance Should Remain A Top Concern in 2017

Over the last few years, the contractor community has braced itself to comply with a slew of new employment regulations issued as a result of Executive Orders by President Obama. These include Paid Sick Leave (up to 7 days), Minimum Wage ($10.20), Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces (reporting of labor law violations and paystub requirements, among others), and the Department of Labor’s regulations increasing the dollar threshold for overtime exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Howev

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

Pre-Award Audit: Is it Time to Panic?

Are you prepared for a letter from the U.S. General Services Administration Office of Inspector General (GSA OIG) stating that your company has been selected for a pre-award audit of the Commercial Sales Practice (CSP) pricing information that will become the basis for the pricing on your contract option extension? The Primary purpose of a Pre-Award Audit The purpose of the pre-award audit pursuant to Clause 52.215-21 Alternate IV (GSAM 515.408(a) (4) of the contract is to ensure that the CSP

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

Photo Finish Bid Decision Survives Protest

In its May decision, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) denied a bid protest despite agreement that the contract award was all but a tossup. After a three year phased acquisition competition between two contractors for the design of radio detection software used in the U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command aircraft, neither contractor had pulled far ahead of the other. The lack of distinction came even with a complicated and detailed evaluation. From the two factors considered, the
 

Pentagon Issues Internal Warning Against Use of Lenovo Equipment

Uh-oh, Lenovo… On September 26, the Pentagon’s Directorate for Intelligence, J-2, reportedly issued an internal report warning against the use of equipment made by computer manufacturer Lenovo because of concerns regarding potential cyber spying against defense networks. J-2 supports the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense, Joint Staff, and Unified Commands, and it is the national focal point for crisis intelligence support to military operations, indications, and wa

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

Pentagon Issues Internal Warning Against Use of Lenovo Equipment

Uh-oh, Lenovo… On September 26, the Pentagon’s Directorate for Intelligence, J-2, reportedly issued an internal report warning against the use of equipment made by computer manufacturer Lenovo because of concerns regarding potential cyber spying against defense networks. J-2 supports the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense, Joint Staff, and Unified Commands, and it is the national focal point for crisis intelligence support to military operations, indications, and wa

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

Ownership & Control of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses

By Wayne Simpson, CFCM, CSCM SBA Issues Proposed Rule –Comments due by March 30, 2018   The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) published its proposed rule for Ownership and Control of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns in the Monday, January 29, 2018, edition of the Federal Register. The proposed rule, part of a joint effort by VA and SBA to reduce the regulatory burden on the Veteran Business Community, will amend SBA’s regulations to implement the provisions in Se

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

OTAs Are Totally, Completely, Amazingly, Revolutionizing Government Procurement. (Not)

By William Weisberg, Every year, the swallows return to Capistrano, the leaves change (at least here in Northern Virginia), and something comes along to revolutionize federal procurement.  LPTA procurements.  Data rights clauses.  FAR part 13. Fixed-price development contracts (if you are old enough to remember those pre-FAR days).  And now…” Other Transaction Authority” (“OTA”).  Avoid all of those pesky statutes and regulations and move FAST!  Sounds good? Sure.  What does it mean?  Read on.

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

One Procurement Produced 24 Protests and a Request for Reconsideration

On March 31, 2017, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a press release concerning a bid protest decision that resolved seventeen protests, which challenged the award of contracts by the Department of Education (DOE) for student loan debt collection services. On March 27, 2017, the GAO sustained several of the protests in part, finding that DOE made several prejudicial errors in evaluating the proposals, which led it to making unreasonable source selection decisions. The GAO reco
 

One Employment Agreement Update You May Be Thankful For

By Tyler Freiberger You’ve likely noticed a flurry of notifications and emails from companies warning you of updated terms and services. The updates were made to comply with Europe’s new General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR), which has been approved since 2016 and went into effect on May 25, 2018. The relevant portion here generally makes it much harder for a website to throw a 200-page legal document at you with vague terms that allow tracking your personal information and selling to the
 

OFCCP’s New Scheduling Letter Expands Intra- and Inter-Agency Data Sharing

Effective July 1, 2016, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) began using its new scheduling letter for compliance evaluations. One of the most significant changes in the form document relates to the agency’s use of data and information submitted by contractors. The “old” letter stated: “Rest assured that OFCCP considers the information you provide in response to this Scheduling Letter as sensitive and confidential. Therefore, any disclosures we may make will be consistent
 

OFCCP Issues New Policy Directives

By Wayne Simpson, CFCM, CSCM On August 10, 2018, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) issued two directives. OFCCP directives provide guidance to OFCCP staff, Federal contractors (and subcontractors) on enforcement and compliance policy or procedures. These directives do not change the laws and regulations governing OFCCP programs and do not establish any legally enforceable rights or obligations. These directives will remain in force in anticipation of an addition to the
 

Of Mistletoe and Misclassification

Earlier this week, a U.S. Department of Labor webpage dedicated to the issue of employee misclassification went live. Just in time for the holidays! While much ink has been spilled in recent weeks regarding potential changes of direction at the DOL in a Trump Administration, the new webpage suggests that the agency will continue to view the abuse of independent contractor status as an enforcement priority for the foreseeable future. The new page does not provide any novel substantive content,

Centre Law & Consulting

Centre Law & Consulting

 

OCI and FCA: Two Acronyms You Never Want to See Together…

By William Weisberg, Esq, Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) are a well-known fixture of government contracting. OCI has its own FAR subsection, FAR part 9.5, and figures prominently in several GAO bid protests every year. OCIs can be waived by the Government, and mitigated by contractors, with the Government’s approval. OCIs are situations where a contractor either has an unfair competitive advantage from previous work done, has impaired objectivity, or has other prohibited items. I
 

OCI and FCA: Two Acronyms You Never Want to See Together…

By William Weisberg, Esq, Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) are a well-known fixture of government contracting. OCI has its own FAR subsection, FAR part 9.5, and figures prominently in several GAO bid protests every year. OCIs can be waived by the Government, and mitigated by contractors, with the Government’s approval. OCIs are situations where a contractor either has an unfair competitive advantage from previous work done, has impaired objectivity, or has other prohibited items. I
 

OCI and FCA: Two Acronyms You Never Want to See Together…

By William Weisberg, Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) are a well-known fixture of government contracting. OCI has its own FAR subsection, FAR part 9.5, and figures prominently in several GAO bid protests every year. OCIs can be waived by the Government, and mitigated by contractors, with the Government’s approval. OCIs are situations where a contractor either has an unfair competitive advantage from previous work done, has impaired objectivity, or has other prohibited items. I spend
 

No Completed PPQs? No Contract.

Last month, in Genesis Design and Development, Inc., B-414254 (Feb. 28, 2017), the Government Accountability Office (GAO) denied a protest challenging the rejection of a proposal where the contractor had failed to provide three past performance questionnaires (PPQs) completed by previous customers. In its proposal, Genesis provided PPQs that provided customer contact information but which did not contain substantive responses from the previous customers. The company argued that it submitted PPQ
 

No April Fools Joke: GSA Refresh/Mass Mods Are Coming!

The General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is planning to refresh ALL Multiple Award Schedules (MAS). The purpose of the refresh is to incorporate provision and clause changes into MAS solicitations and contracts. Be on the lookout for updates tentatively planned for April 2017. Major changes to the Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be included in these Refreshes/Mass Mods that will impact both large and small businesses. Look for changes in the Model Subc
 

Ninth Circuit Rules Employer Can Pay Female Employee Less Based on Prior Salary

The Ninth Circuit recently ruled in Rizo v. Yovino that a female’s prior salary can be a “factor other than sex,” thus justifying a pay disparity between comparable male and female employees for purposes of the Equal Pay Act. The plaintiff was an employee of the public schools in Fresno County, California. Upon discovering that the County paid her less than her male counterparts for the same work, she brought an action against the County under the Equal Pay Act. The County conceded that it paid
Sign in to follow this  
×
×
  • Create New...